[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-framework-03.txt

2006-11-29 Thread Lars-Erik Jonsson
As per Magnus request, the draft has been updated. See inline what has been changed. BR, /L-E -First comment is an exception, it is technical: 4.4 page 11 doesn't metion that ROHC has the capability to work without a feedback channel, i.e., on simplex/one-way links. As it is both an unique

Re: [Gen-art] Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt

2006-11-29 Thread Ralph Droms
Yeah. I have to agree with James and Brian: in retrospect, the M/O bits are useless and further discussion at this point is even more useless. - Ralph On 11/29/06 4:58 AM, Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The MO bits were defined long before we had DHCPv6 in place. And they

RE: [Gen-art] Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt

2006-11-29 Thread Durand, Alain
I concur with the uselessness of the bits. However, I've heard some implementers who where talking about implementing extra code/logic to try to match what they thought the semantic of those bits was/should be/should have been... This is adding complexity, brittleness and opening doors to all