[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-10.txt

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-06

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] about draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-16.txt

I have no reason to change my review (of the -15 version) summary from Ready to something else. BTW I maintain my *minor* editorial concerns in 4.1 page 7 (spurious minimum words) and 4.2.2 page 10 (e.g. without the mandatory ','). Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Gen-art] about draft-daboo-imap-annotatemore-16.txt

Hi Francis, Thanks for your review. --On December 5, 2008 10:50:24 AM +0100 Francis Dupont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no reason to change my review (of the -15 version) summary from Ready to something else. BTW I maintain my *minor* editorial concerns in 4.1 page 7 (spurious minimum

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-10.txt

Francis, Thanks for the review. Proposed resolutions for comments are inline. spt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 4:33 AM To: gen-art@ietf.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL