Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-06.txt

2009-08-20 Thread Ralph Droms
Russ - I've added the RFC Editor comments. I expect we'll need another rev before publication, which should incorporate those comments. - Ralph On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:58 PM 8/19/09, Russ Housley wrote: Ralph: Russ - would you be willing to clear your DISCUSS and capture Joel's new issues

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-aero-reqs-04.txt

2009-08-20 Thread Vijay K. Gurbani
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mext-aero-reqs-04.txt

2009-08-20 Thread Vijay K. Gurbani
[RESEND, forgot to CC the chairs ... sorry.] I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-pkix-authorityclearanceconstraints-02.txt

2009-08-20 Thread Sean Turner
Francis Dupont wrote: In your previous mail you wrote: Minor issues: - IMHO a transition paragraph is needed at the end of the Introduction in order to introduce technical dependencies: * clearance attribute is in fact from 3281bis (this is obvious when one reads

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-pkix-authorityclearanceconstraints-02.txt

2009-08-20 Thread Santosh Chokhani
Francis, Good catch on Authority Clearance Constraints not asserting clearance as an attribute. We are fixing the I-D. -Original Message- From: francis.dup...@fdupont.fr [mailto:francis.dup...@fdupont.fr] Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 12:44 PM To: Sean Turner Cc:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-freed-sieve-in-xml-05

2009-08-20 Thread Ben Campbell
The thread so far has gotten difficult to follow, so I'm going to try to reset the conversation. I think we have been disagreeing in 2 areas. The first is how much the document should say about how much semantic knowledge of sieve is expected for editors. On rereading the thread, I think

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-06.txt

2009-08-20 Thread Russ Housley
I cleared. At 07:39 AM 8/20/2009, Ralph Droms wrote: Russ - I've added the RFC Editor comments. I expect we'll need another rev before publication, which should incorporate those comments. - Ralph On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:58 PM 8/19/09, Russ Housley wrote: Ralph: Russ - would you be willing

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 20 Aug 2009

2009-08-20 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments for this week: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-090820-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html

[Gen-art] Assignments for August 27, 2009 Telechat

2009-08-20 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi all, Here's the link to the summary of assignments for the Aug 27, 2009 telechat: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-090827.html With the updated spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html