[Gen-art] (summary) review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-25.txt

2010-10-28 Thread Francis Dupont
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-25.txt

[Gen-art] (full) review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-25.txt

2010-10-28 Thread Francis Dupont
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-25.txt

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05

2010-10-28 Thread Vijay K. Gurbani
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05

2010-10-28 Thread Thomson, Martin
Thanks Vijay, On 2010-10-29 at 13:31:12, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: NEW: If device identity is present, the identity of the requester in the form of the source IP address is not used to identify the subject of the request. I'll add that to the next revision, thanks. 2) S2,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-05

2010-10-28 Thread Vijay K. Gurbani
On 10/28/2010 09:36 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote: The list of identifiers in RFC 5687 is longer than this allows for. This offers an explanation for the shortfall. The separation of identity and measurement concepts came a little later. Martin: I noticed that as well ... it is just that for