[Gen-art] : Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-radius-ext-05

2011-08-11 Thread Wassim Haddad
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] (full/final) review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-05.txt

2011-08-11 Thread Francis Dupont
Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20110804 IETF LC End Date: 20110811 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: as I explained in the previous review, I deeply disagree with the presentation of ICMP Ping for traceroute. If traceroute (and its path MTU

[Gen-art] review of draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt

2011-08-11 Thread Francis Dupont
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming

2011-08-11 Thread Stewart Bryant
On 10/08/2011 19:35, Adrian Farrel wrote: Hi Ben, Thanks for reading. Nits/editorial comments: -- section 1, paragraph 4: ...with relation to the programming... ... in relation to... Yeah. RFC Editor note if Stewart is watching (although I'm guessing the RFC Editor might just fix this

Re: [Gen-art] (full/final) review of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-05.txt

2011-08-11 Thread Ronald Bonica
PS: I've downgraded the ICMP traceroute point to minor. Francis, Thanks for catching this one. While it may not be major, it is embarrassing. I have proposed alternative text. Ron ___

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-16

2011-08-11 Thread Adrian Farrel
Alexey, hello. Thanks for the review. In line. Adrian Minor issues: 1.1. Design Considerations As is described in [RFC4379], to avoid potential Denial of Service attacks, it is RECOMMENDED to regulate the LSP Ping traffic passed to the control plane. A rate limiter should

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping-16

2011-08-11 Thread Alexey Melnikov
Adrian Farrel wrote: Alexey, hello. Thanks for the review. In line. Adrian Minor issues: 1.1. Design Considerations As is described in [RFC4379], to avoid potential Denial of Service attacks, it is RECOMMENDED to regulate the LSP Ping traffic passed to the control plane. A rate

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2011-08-11

2011-08-11 Thread A. Jean Mahoney
Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/reviewers-110811-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art.html http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/dav/genart/gen-art-by-reviewer.html The standard

[Gen-art] Telechat review of draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update-10 (for the record)

2011-08-11 Thread Elwyn Davies
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: