Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-38.txt

On 2013-11-20 19:23, Jari Arkko wrote: > Thank you for your extensive review and Magnus thank you for > addressing the issues. Are you tracking the nits from below? Yes, I will edit them in as part of the update taking care of the discuss the document has gotten. /Magnus > > I have balloted no-

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review Date: 20 Nov 2013 IETF LC End Date: 22 Oct 2013 IETF Te

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication-02.txt (resent)

Francis: Thank you for your review. I have balloted a no-obj position for this document. Jari On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote: > hi Francis > > Thanks for the review. The first nit, yes, i think I missed the one preferred > by the RFC editor (this will be fixed by th

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mmusic-duplication-grouping-03

Joel: thank you for your review. I have balloted a no-obj for this document. Jari On Sep 13, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-ecrit-unauthenticated-access-07.txt

Thank you for the review and updates! Jari On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > Hi Alexey, > > thanks for the review. I have incorporated your comments in the updated > version. I will have to incorporate the comments from Richard as well before > I submit a new version.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-11

Thank you for the review and updates! I have balloted no-obj for this document. Jari On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Thomson wrote: > > (some text skipped) >>> [Authors] We summarize what the document i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3-09

Many thanks for your review, Robert! Daniele, thank you for the modifications. However, I do not see the IANA section modification yet in -11. But maybe I missed it. Has that been incorporated to the latest version? (I thought your text suggestion looked fine.) Jari On Oct 15, 2013, at 5:21 AM

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-38.txt

Thank you for your extensive review and Magnus thank you for addressing the issues. Are you tracking the nits from below? I have balloted no-obj. Jari On Nov 19, 2013, at 6:57 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I have been selected as an additional General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for thi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-10

Thank you for the review and re-review; thank you Hannes for the updates. I have balloted no-obj. Jari On Nov 18, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14

On 2013-11-19 18:53, Barry Leiba wrote: -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are all willing to grant the BCP78 rights

Re: [Gen-art] #520, was: Fwd: Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-24 with security considerations

Hi Mark, Then the same would be true for many of the other listed security/privacy considerations (privacy in URIs, mention of cookies within scope of privacy, etc.). This is at the same level, but provides a pointer to look deeper. The additional sentences round out the other considerations

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-05.txt

Hi Christian/Med, I checked out the -06 version submitted this morning, and it addresses all my comments. Thanks for taking care of this quickly. Regards Suresh On 11/19/2013 05:47 AM, christian.jacque...@orange.com wrote: > Hello Suresh, > > Thanks for your review. We will update the draft in