[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-15

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-15 Reviewer:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-64share

Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2014-03-20

Hi all, Meral will be reviewing draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-loss-conceal-10, and Ben and Joel will also be reviewing draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-04. Thanks, Jean On 3/20/14 5:53 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft --

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview-14.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-ov

[Gen-art] gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-20

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-08

The -08 version of this draft addresses all of the nits noted in the Gen-ART review of the -07 version. The -08 version is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC. Thanks, --David > -Original Message- > From: Black, David > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:23 PM > To: schm...@inf

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08

On 21/03/2014 12:18, Thomas Narten wrote: Hi Stewart. At the time when I was getting this ready for the IESG, there was a strong view by the IESG that the IETF stream should not be used to publish this type of document, i.e. that this type of draft should go to the ISE. The view was that there

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-07.txt

Hi Brian, Thank you for your comment, indeed this is an English inaccuracy :) BR, Fred -Original Message- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2014 16:21 To: draft-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review Tea

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08

Hi Stewart. > At the time when I was getting this ready for the IESG, there was a strong > view by the IESG that the IETF stream should not be used to publish > this type of document, i.e. that this type of draft should go to the > ISE. The view was that there were far too many AD sponsored drafts

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08

Since I put this into IETF LC On 21/03/2014 11:46, Thomas Narten wrote: FWIW, this document should be informational. I'm not sure why the shepherd writeup went experimental. My recollection of the discussion within the NVO3 WG was that Informational was the way to go. More importantly, this docu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08

FWIW, this document should be informational. I'm not sure why the shepherd writeup went experimental. My recollection of the discussion within the NVO3 WG was that Informational was the way to go. More importantly, this document has all the hallmarks of a document that has traditionally gone out as

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-13.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-netmod-system