Re: [Gen-art] Pre-telechat re-review of draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe

2015-05-26 Thread Stephen Farrell
On 26/05/15 22:36, Jari Arkko wrote: > I assume the authors will work through the nits. Yep, we'll unpick any nits as required Ta, S. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Pre-telechat re-review of draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe

2015-05-26 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Tom! I assume the authors will work through the nits. I have placed a No-Objection position on the ballot for this document. Jari On 26 May 2015, at 21:09, Tom Taylor wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see th

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-08

2015-05-26 Thread Wassim Haddad
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-08 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review Date: 26 May 2015 IETF LC End Date: 01 June 2015 IETF Telechat

[Gen-art] Pre-telechat re-review of draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe

2015-05-26 Thread Tom Taylor
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-tls-negotiat

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-09.txt

2015-05-26 Thread Leeyoung
Hi Francis, Sorry that I missed your comment. Your correction will be updated in the next revision. Thanks. Young -Original Message- From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 6:21 AM To: Francis Dupont Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signali

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of 07 draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-17

2015-05-26 Thread Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: 07 draft-ietf-d

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-13

2015-05-26 Thread Jari Arkko
Meral, Ram - thank you for the review & edits. Jari On 26 May 2015, at 08:35, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) wrote: > Hi Meral, > > we will be addressing these comments as per the reply I had sent to your > email . I am currently holding off the edits as we had couple of comments > from the WG which

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

2015-05-26 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the review & edits, Robert, Alexey, and Peter. Jari On 22 Apr 2015, at 16:03, Robert Sparks wrote: > > > On 4/22/15 5:50 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> On 21/04/2015 21:21, Robert Sparks wrote: >>> Nit: >>> >>> The introduction calls out email addresses as an exam

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth-06

2015-05-26 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review again, Alexey! Jari On 10 May 2015, at 19:24, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-07

2015-05-26 Thread Jari Arkko
Christer, Ian, Many thanks for the good review & actions to improve the document. I have balloted no-obj for this document on this week’s IESG telechat. Jari On 22 May 2015, at 07:25, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-siprec-protocol-16

2015-05-26 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you for your extensive review, Peter. Authors, do you have thoughts on Peter’s questions? FWIW I thought these at least were important points: > Page 21, section 8.1.5, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: by “content” do you > actually mean “context”? Or do you mean to the content of a SIPREC > r

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-09.txt

2015-05-26 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you very much for your review, Francis. Jari On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:49, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601bis-04.txt

2015-05-26 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Alexey! On 11 Mar 2015, at 15:12, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Please wait for direction from your document