Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3-13

Apologies. I was looking at an old version, not -14. Please ignore this comment. Cheers, Elwyn e.g., in s1 (before last para): [[Comment.1:RFC22203 states that when data integrity is used, the seq_num in the rpc_gss_data_t must be the same as

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3-13

> On Jan 5, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > > Apologies. I was looking at an old version, not -14. Hi Elwyn OK. I’ll have a new version 15 out today with response to all review comments. —>Andy > > Please ignore this comment. > > Cheers, > Elwyn > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-39

Hi. One oops: The comment for rpcsec-gssv3 should apply to s2.7.1.4 and not s2.3.1.4. On 04/01/2016 16:44, Adamson, Andy wrote: On Jan 1, 2016, at 7:18 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: Hi. Happy New Year! Happy New Year :) I trust you have had a good break. Now back to

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-39

> On Jan 5, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > Hi. > > One oops: The comment for rpcsec-gssv3 should apply to s2.7.1.4 and not > s2.3.1.4. No problem - I noticed that. > > On 04/01/2016 16:44, Adamson, Andy wrote: >>> On Jan 1, 2016, at 7:18 PM, Elwyn Davies

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-pcr-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

Confirming that rev -15 addresses my Gen-ART review comments... - Ralph > On Dec 16, 2015, at 11:19 AM 12/16/15, Ralph Droms (rdroms) > wrote: > > >> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:47 AM 12/16/15, Alexey Melnikov >> wrote: >> >> Hi Ralph, >> Thank you

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

Hi Karen, On 05/01/2016 10:42, Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen wrote: HI, Please find some feedback below. BR, Karen *From:*Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com ] *Sent:* 4. januar 2016 11:48 *To:* Yoshifumi Nishida

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover-14

HI, Please find some feedback below. BR, Karen *From:* Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com] *Sent:* 4. januar 2016 11:48 *To:* Yoshifumi Nishida *Cc:* General area reviewing team ; draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-failover@ietf.org; The

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-39

Hi, Tom. The existence of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc3530-migration-update was pointed out to me this evening. After a cursory read I realised that SETCLIENTID had been MNI'd in 4.1 so that there is a minor infelicity in the comments in minorversion2-dot-x (and in 4.1). The comment here: ///