Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15

Sorry it’s late here… > Am 30.06.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) : > > Hi Brian, hi Jari, > > I’ve put updating Martin’s affliction incl. email address as well as removing > the conclusion already in the RFC editor (in case we don’t do another update >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15

Hi Brian, hi Jari, I’ve put updating Martin’s affliction incl. email address as well as removing the conclusion already in the RFC editor (in case we don’t do another update before publication). I note your concerns about the references to individual drafst, however, not sure how this fix

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15

Thanks much, Brian! Authors, do note Brian’s comments. Jari On 24 Jun 2016, at 05:48, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09

Thanks! On 10 Jun 2016, at 15:08, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document: >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb-05

> Summary: Ready Thanks, all! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

Thanks, all! Jari On 29 Jun 2016, at 17:07, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > Perfect timing. My only pending issue is addressed. From the Gen-ART point pf > view this document is Ready. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Dan > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Cyrus Daboo

Re: [Gen-art] Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04

Hi Robert, Thanks for your thorough comments. See below. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-trill-irb-13.txt

Francis, Donald, thank you for the review & updates. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

Perfect timing. My only pending issue is addressed. From the Gen-ART point pf view this document is Ready. Thanks and Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: Cyrus Daboo [mailto:cy...@daboo.name] > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 5:04 PM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); A. Jean Mahoney;

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

Hi Dan, --On June 29, 2016 at 1:44:03 PM + "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote: Hi, There was no update to this document since my previous review. My original review raised two issues - one was clarified by explanations from Alexey (thanks!); the other is about the

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

On 29/06/2016 14:44, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: Hi, There was no update to this document since my previous review. My original review raised two issues - one was clarified by explanations from Alexey (thanks!); the other is about the document status (should it be marked as 'Updates RFC

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

Hi, There was no update to this document since my previous review. My original review raised two issues - one was clarified by explanations from Alexey (thanks!); the other is about the document status (should it be marked as 'Updates RFC 5545'?). I did not see that addressed. It would be nice