Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-manageability-14

Hi Elwyn, Many thanks for the review! We’ve incorporated editorial nit fixes into revision -15 of the draft (for details, see https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/455 ). Cheers, Brian > On 8 Feb 2022, at 02:29, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-applicability-14

hi Ines, Many thanks for the review! We've proposed alternate text to address the issue in https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/451. NEW: Measurement studies have shown between three {{Trammell16}} and five {{Swett16}} percent of networks block all UDP traffic, though there is little

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-06

hi David, On 24 Jun 2014, at 23:41, Black, David david.bl...@emc.com wrote: With correct subject line this time ... -Original Message- From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black, David Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:14 PM To: i...@trammell.ch; General Area

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05

Message- From: Brian Trammell [mailto:i...@trammell.ch] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 5:22 AM To: Black, David Cc: General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org); ip...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05 hi David, Many thanks

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05

hi David, Many thanks for the review. Comments and questions inline. On 24 May 2014, at 04:10, Black, David david.bl...@emc.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] GenART LC review of draft-ietf-ipfix-ie-doctors-03

Hi, Roni, Many thanks for the review; I've addressed these points in the -04 revision of the document. Best regards, Brian On Jul 15, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Roni Even wrote: Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-mile-iodef-xmlreg-01.txt

Hi, Suresh, Thanks for the comment; yes, this one is a bit hard to parse (even for me, and I tend to write page-length sentences). I've tweaked your suggested text somewhat and applied to the current working copy of the -02 revision. Best regards, Brian On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Suresh

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

the lines. Thoughts? Cheers, Brian On Jan 24, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 1/24/12 9:59 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: On 24/01/2012 16:45, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 1/24/12 2:25 AM, Brian Trammell wrote: Hi, Alexey, So far only one voice on the WG list, stating no need

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

Hi, Alexey, one more round (hopefully) :) ... On Jan 23, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Okay; how about the following (including Alexey's comments from the previous review, and pointing more specifically to 6125) tRID systems MUST verify the identity of their peers against

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

Hi, Alexey, I can take the CN-ID question to the MILE WG on this. In any case, is it clear enough from this language that CN-ID is a compatibility-only feature? Cheers, Brian On Jan 23, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: On 23/01/2012 14:22, Brian Trammell wrote: Hi, Alexey, Hi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

Hi Alexey, Thanks for helping me work through these... one more round on open issues, inline below: On Jan 18, 2012, at 6:43 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Brian, On 18/01/2012 16:16, Brian Trammell wrote: On Jan 18, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: On 17/01/2012 10:16, Brian

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

On Jan 18, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: On 18/01/2012 17:43, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Brian, On 18/01/2012 16:16, Brian Trammell wrote: On Jan 18, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Actually, since the binding between RID and a PKI is better defined in rfc6045-bis

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

Hi, Peter, Alexey, all, On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 1/19/12 10:32 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Brian, On 19/01/2012 09:48, Brian Trammell wrote: On Jan 18, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: On 18/01/2012 17:43, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Brian

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

On Jan 18, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: On 17/01/2012 10:16, Brian Trammell wrote: Hi, Alexey, Thanks for the review; questions and comments thereon inline... On Jan 14, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

Hi, Alexey, Thanks for the review; questions and comments thereon inline... On Jan 14, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.