[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-mib-extension-12 .txt

Authors, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: dr

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-03.txt

I am the designated Gen-ART Last call reviewer for this draft (draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-03.txt). I havew no comments to make about this draft, hence I did not include the authors in the "To" or "Cc" list. No additonal comments need to be addressed as a result of this review. Document: draft

RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-06.txt

I have reviewed version -08 of this document and it addreses all of the comments I have made previously. I believe this document is now ready to publish as a Proposed Standard RFC. -- Eric --> -Original Message- --> From: Gray, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Sent:

[Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART Review (LC) of draft-jeong-dnsop-ipv6-dns-discovery-0 8.txt

r" Otherwise, I believe this draft is ready for publishing as an Experimental RFC. -- Eric --> -Original Message- --> From: Jaehoon Jeong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:53 PM --> To: 'Gray, Eric'; 'Jaehoon Paul Jeong'; &

RE: [Gen-art] re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt- dnsdomain-03.txt

t; From: CTO YAN Renxiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:56 PM --> To: Gray, Eric --> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; Jari Arkko --> Subject: [Gen-art] re: Gen-ART LC review of --> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain-03.txt --> --> Hi, Eric, --> --&

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain-03.txt

Authors, I am the the assigned General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-06.txt

Authors, I am the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Last Call reviewer for this draft - draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-06.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Cal

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-opsec-current-practices-07.txt

Merike, I am the Gen-ART assigned reviewer for this draft: draft-ietf-opsec-current-practices-07.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html Please wait for instruction from the ap

RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-06

to the list of acronyms, defined in section 2, and inserted the reference there), but it takes a bit less thought to follow this way. Chances are this could be handled as a note to the RFC Editor. -- Eric --> -Original Message- --> From: Gray, Eric --> Sent: Wednesday, August 09,

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-hip-base-06.txt

Authors (Thomas/Petri/Pekka/Robert), I am the Gen-ART assigned Last Call reviewer for this draft: draft-ietf-hip-base-06.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html Please resolve these comments al

[Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-nystrom-ct-kip-01.txt

Magnus, et al, I have reviewed the updated version of this draft and I feel that it more than adequately addresses my comments. -- Eric --> -Original Message- --> From: Magnus Nyström [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 7:41 AM --> To: Gray,

[Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-exclude-route-0 5.txt

Adrian, et al, Please see additional comments or expansion, on earlier comments, below. ... --> --> > In section 1.1, you say: --> > --> > "This document does not preclude a route exclusion from --> > listing arbitrary nodes or network elements to avoid. --> > The intent is, however, t

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-exclude-route-05.tx t

Authors, I am the Gen-ART assigned Last Call Reviewer for this document. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-ppvpn-mcast-reqts-08 .txt

Thomas/Mark, I am the assigned Gen-ART Last Call reviewer for this document. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html Please consider these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive, and as

[Gen-art] GenART Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sipping-gruu-reg-event-06.t xt

Paul, I am the assigned GenART reviewer for this draft last call. The draft/version is draft-ietf-sipping-gruu-reg-event-06.txt as present in the Internet Draft depository. For information on GenART, see the FAQ located at: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.htm

[Gen-art] GenART Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-14.txt

Adrian/Tom, I am the assigned General Area Review Team member for this draft Last Call. While I am not a MIB expert, I found the draft relatively easy to read, it looks to be correct and it appears to me to be ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. -- Eric __

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-rddp-sctp-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this document. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html Please consider these comments along with any other last call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-rddp-sct

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-nystrom-ct-kip-01.txt

Magnus, I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for: draft-nystrom-ct-kip-01.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for instructions from Russ Housley before taking any action on these comments. This docu

[Gen-art] RE: Last Call: 'IPv6 Router Advertisement Option for DNS Configur ation' to Experimental RFC (draft-jeong-dnsop-ipv6-dns-discovery)

Paul, This change would also satisfy my concerns with section 7 (with the exception that you should also qualify the statements that currently imply that the proposal does not introduce new security risks). I omitted the IPv6 mailing list as they have not seen my comments... --

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review (LC) of draft-jeong-dnsop-ipv6-dns-discovery-08.tx t

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for: draft-jeong-dnsop-ipv6-dns-discovery-08.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. ---

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review (LC) of draft-ietf-ipfix-as-08.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-ipfix-as-08.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. -

RE: [Gen-art] Re: draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt

, June 14, 2006 8:18 AM --> To: Mark Townsley --> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Vince Mammoliti'; 'Gray, Eric'; --> Gen-ART@ietf.org --> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Re: draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt --> --> If it's FCFS, it would be a violation of RFC

[Gen-art] RE: draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt

nesday, June 14, 2006 3:18 AM --> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Cc: 'Gray, Eric'; 'Vince Mammoliti'; Gen-ART@ietf.org --> Subject: Re: draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt --> --> Peter Arberg wrote: --> > Hi, --> > --> > thanks Eric for the review and the goo

RE: [Gen-art] RE: draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt

resolution of the reference issues... -- Eric --> -Original Message- --> From: Peter Arberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 5:22 PM --> To: 'Mark Townsley'; 'Gray, Eric' --> Cc: 'Vince Mammoliti'; Gen-ART@ietf.org -->

RE: [Gen-art] RE: REVIEW: draft-ietf-imss-fc-vf-mib-02.txt

Completely agree with Michael, no humility about it. As usual authors are certainly allowed to ignore comments with import that is not consistent with their expert knowledge. We do provide a pointer to a FAQ that explains why we are doing a review, and it's alright if you haven't read that. :-

[Gen-art] draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt

Peter/Vince, I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. ++

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-02.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ located at: . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. The do

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-mobike-design-08

Tero/Hannes, I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for your draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Draft: http://www.ie

RE: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-04.txt

Alexey, The short answer is that the explanations below clarify things greatly. Please see below for some additional comments. -- Eric --> -Original Message- --> From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:31 AM --> To: Gray,

RE: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-04.txt

--> -Original Message- --> From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:15 AM --> To: Gray, Eric --> Cc: Gen-ART@ietf.org; Lisa Dusseault; Cyrus Daboo --> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of --> draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-0

RE: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-04.txt

Below are my comments on the specified document, which I am submitting as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Draft: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-imapflags-04.txt Q

RE: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-dcr (Experime ntal)

Authors, et al, Attached is my review of the specified document, which I am submitting as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Draft: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-dcr-0

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-mib-01.txt

Bill/Dave, The General Area Review Team selected me as a reviewer for this specification (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Substantive Comments: None. Questions: = None. NITs: None. Assuming that n

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-sasl-plain-08.txt

Kurt/Sam, I doubt I will uncover anything substantive in this draft, though I might have some questions about it and I will most likely find a few editorial NITs. Hopefully you can bear with me if my questions are a result of unfamilarity with the language of the document and secu