age-
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 1:00 PM
> To: Robert Sparks ; John Scudder
>
> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org;
> last-c...@ietf.org;
> l...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks
> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 11:18 AM
> To: John Scudder ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
>
> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org;
> last-c...@ietf.org;
> l...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Genart last call review of d
Robert -
Thanx for your review - apologies for the delay in responding.
Please see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 1:09 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8919bis@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; l...@iet
Jouni -
Just to let you know that V14 of the draft was posted today and it includes all
of the corrections you requested.
Thanx again for your review.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 8:02 AM
> To: Jouni Korhon
Jouni -
Thanx for the review.
I have addressed the editorial issues you raised - though I will wait for
additional comments from other reviewers before publishing a new version.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 6:11 AM
>
Elwyn’s comment was:
I was trying to understand
why a router that satisfies the previous condition so that it is
legitimate for it to announce ELC with any IP address prefix might wish
to only announce it with some prefixes and not others.
The answer to that is clearly stated in the draft (emph
Russ -
Thanx for the careful review.
I have uploaded V5 of the draft which addresses your comments subject to my
responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 2:38 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc530
Erik -
Thanx for the detailed review.
I have published V24 of the draft which addresses all of your comments (and a
few pending AD review comments from Alvaro).
Some exceptions noted below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Kline via Datatracker
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 7:20 PM
Erik -
Thanx for the review.
Responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Kline
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 11:30 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org
> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm
Paul -
Thanx for the careful review and the kind words.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Kyzivat
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2018 12:06 PM
> To: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis@ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lsr-is
ou.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Halpern Direct
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 1:16 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Joel Halpern
> ; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop@ietf.org;
> spr...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
>
Joel -
I am not an author of this draft - but I am an author on the referenced IS-IS
draft - which I assume is one of the drafts mentioned in your comment:
> Server). Looking at the relevant routing protocol document, they point to
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-confli
Meral -
Thanx for the review.
Some of your comments have already been addressed in the latest version (07)
published a few days ago.
Responses inline.
From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 8:02 PM
To: draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions@
pick a name which
reflects how the link is to be used while it is still up.
Les
From: Pushpasis Sarkar [mailto:pushpasis.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 9:22 AM
To: Bruno Decraene
Cc: Shraddha Hegde ; Acee Lindem (acee) ;
Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant
problems may exist.
It is a mistake to assume that this mechanism is always intended to be used as
a precursor to link shutdown.
Les
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 8:47 AM
To: Shraddha Hegde ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Joel
Halpern ; gen-art
Ketan –
“maintenance” I could live with.
“GIR” seems to not be generic enough.
Les
From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 8:09 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; Joel Halpern ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: o...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf
Acee -
From: Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 6:44 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Joel Halpern
; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: o...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11
Hi Les
> >Minor issues:
> >I understand the WG likes using the term "overload" for a link
> >being taken
> >out of service. I think people will learn what we mean. I do wish
> >we had
> >not chosen to misuse the words in this fashion. This is much more a
> >graceful-link-close ind
In regards to
> > 4. Section 3.3:
> >
> > 'The originating router MUST NOT advertise overlapping ranges.'
> >
> > How are conflicts resolved at receiver?
>
> SRLB sub-TLV is not used by routers running ISIS. The advertisement is only
> there for the benefit of external entities such as controller
anges relative to RFC 6822 are not desirable."
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Orit Levin [mailto:or...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 4:59 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-mi-bis@tools.ietf.o
onday, April 10, 2017 3:07 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Alvaro Retana (aretana); Robert Sparks; gen-
> a...@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04
>
> Hi R
Orit -
Thanx for the review.
Responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Orit Levin [mailto:or...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 8:27 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-mi-bis@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i
t: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:45 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Robert Sparks; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf-04
>
> On 4/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Le
Robert -
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:18 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Genart l
Robert -
Thanx for the review.
Reply inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 1:25 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-auto-conf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject: Genart last call rev
John -
From: John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 2:04 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg
Mirsky
Cc: Robert Sparks; m...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
isis
Eric -
From: Eric Gray [mailto:eric.g...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:32 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Uma Chunduri; John E Drake; Acee Lindem (acee);
Alexander Vainshtein; Greg Mirsky
Cc: m...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; isis-cha...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf
John -
From: John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:19 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg
Mirsky
Cc: Robert Sparks; m...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
isis
t.
I am just asking for folks to pause and think about this a bit more from an
architectural perspective.
Les
From: John E Drake [mailto:jdr...@juniper.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:20 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg
Mirsky
Cc: Robert S
hat RFC 6823 stipulates that a
separate instance of the protocol (a la RFC 6822) be used for such cases.
Les
From: Uma Chunduri [mailto:uma.chund...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 11:41 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); John E Drake; Acee Lindem (acee); Alexander
Vainshtein; Greg
); Alexander Vainshtein; Greg Mirsky; Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg)
Cc: Robert Sparks; m...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
isis-cha...@ietf.org; Abhay Roy (akr)
Subject: RE: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12
Acee,
Relying on an
: Robert Sparks; m...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg); isis-cha...@ietf.org; Abhay Roy (akr)
Subject: Re: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-12
Hi Acee,
the draft defines optional functionality. If an operator
Dale -
Attached please find an updated version and diffs from previous.
Please let me know if this adequately addresses your comments.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale R. Worley [mailto:wor...@ariadne.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 8:26 AM
> To: Les Ginsbe
nt: Monday, August 08, 2016 10:28 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime@tools.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-02
Hi,
>Thanx for your review.
>
>ISO 10589 is the base specification for IS-IS and there i
Christer -
Thanx for your review.
ISO 10589 is the base specification for IS-IS and there is a reference to it in
the document.
This is where you will find details about Link State PDUs.
I would be reluctant to include any sort of summary description of an LSP in
this document out of fear that
Dale -
Thanx for your detailed review. I have elected to copy the WG on my reply as
you also sent a copy of your review to the WG.
Overall, while I either agree with or have no objection to many of your
comments, most of them could be applied to RFC 4971 itself. When generating the
bis version
:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2016 12:49 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes@ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes-03
>
> Hi Les,
>
> T
Paul -
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 12:31 PM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes@ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call re
Paul -
Thanx for the review.
Responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 11:18 AM
> To: draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes@ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of dra
Jari -
Thanx for the comments.
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:58 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: Robert Sparks; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-isis-route-
> preferen
Robert -
Thanx for the review.
Responses inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 12:14 PM
> To: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-isis-route-preference@ietf.org;
> i...@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org
> Subject:
Robert -
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 8:14 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoi...@tools.ietf.org;
> isis...@ietf.org; General Area Review Team
> Subject: Re: [Isis-wg]
Robert -
> -Original Message-
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 7:27 AM
> To: draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoi...@tools.ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org; General
> Area Review Team
> Subject: [Isis-wg] Gen-art LC review draft-ie
Meral -
Thanx for your review.
Responses inline.
From: Meral Shirazipour [mailto:meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 5:46 PM
To: draft-ietf-isis-fs-lsp@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-isis-fs-lsp-01
I am the assigned Ge
Dan -
Thanx for the review.
I have no objection to your suggestion. I would hope this change can be done by
the RFC Editor.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:droma...@avaya.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 5:35 AM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 12:26 PM
> To: draft-ietf-isis-genapp@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: General Area Review Team; The IETF
> Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-isis-genapp-04
>
> I am the assigned Gen-
at was the
intent of "Specification Required" - but your comments suggest
otherwise.
I really wish RFC 5226 addressed this more robustly...
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 8:55 AM
> To: Les
Ben -
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:10 AM
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: draft-ietf-isis-genapp@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review
> Team; The IETF
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat
Ben -
Thanx for the review.
Inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:06 PM
> To: draft-ietf-isis-genapp@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review
Team
> Cc: The IETF
> Subject: Gen-ART LC/Telechat Review of draft-ietf-i
Brian -
Thanx for the review - I will work with Danny to get the editorial
issues corrected. Some replies to your non-editorial questions/issues:
Do you want the IESG to also reclassify RFC3786 as Historic?
If so, I suggest saying this explicitly in the Introduction.
LES: I would think obsolete
dards - this document being one of them.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:13 PM
> To: Mike Shand (mshand); Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; Ross Callon
> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-
51 matches
Mail list logo
