Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
d" or an "or" in the
list.
Please consider whether you should follow this list format in this section.
From: Neil Jenkins
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 11:13 PM
To: Susan Hares ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-sharing@ietf.org; IETF JMAP Mailing List
; last-c...@ietf.
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last-call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Almost Ready
GEN-ART review
Status: Almost ready
Summary Comment:
==
Multicast distribution can aid the network, so it is important to have a solid
standard.
Wow! This is an amazing amount of work to combine EVPN and MVPN.
I went between RFC6513
registries-13
Peter Yee Last Call 2023-12-22 draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-10
Early review requests:
Reviewer DueDraft
Elwyn Davies 2023-06-09 draft-ietf-drip-registries-14
Thomas Fossati 2024-01-12 draft-ietf-bess-extended-evpn-opti
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last-call comments
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
you include comments on rate limiting of reverse RDAP?
Thank you, Sue Hares
From: Mario Loffredo
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 5:27 AM
To: Susan Hares ; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org;
reg...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Genart last call
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Gyan:
Could you unpack the following statements a bit:
Is tunnel type RFC 7510 MPLS over UDP supported. Also RFC 8663 SR-MPLS over IP
for SRv6 and SR-MPLS interoperability where MPLS over GRE RFC 4023 is used or
RFC 7510 MPLS over UDP and outer encapsulation is IPv6 for SRv6 forwarding
Joel:
Thank you for your timely review.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern via
Datatracker
Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 10:52 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
Alissa:
Here’s Nitin’s response to Peter.
Sue Hares
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Bahadur
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 2:55 AM
To: pe...@akayla.com
Cc: i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of
Peter and Alissa:
Thank you for your careful review. I believe I saw Nitin's reply to Peter's
comments in email - so I'll look for that email and forward it.
As Shepherd, I will work with the authors to try to address the issues in 2.2,
and section 5.
>I think there's a discussion missing
Robert:
Thank you for the review and a big thanks for catching the "F" Bit issue in
section 4.3. I apologize for letting that slip through my shepherd filter.
I suspect I've been reading this draft so often, that I'm starting to miss
the obvious.
Your point is valid about expanding the
Francis:
Thank you for reviewing this document.
Susan Hares
WG Chair
-Original Message-
From: Francis Dupont [mailto:francis.dup...@fdupont.fr]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 11:30 AM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication@ietf.org
Subject: review
Stewart:
Thank you for your review! To come back from IETF and immediately complete
your review shows awesome dedication!
Cheerily, Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 12:52 PM
To:
Dale:
Thank you for taking the time do a second careful review. I can only wish
I such an excellent review of documents I am an editor on. Version 14
addresses all of your comments.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale Worley
Sent:
Dale:
Thank you for the second review. I'll address these issues along with
others later today.
Sue Hares
-Original Message-
From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale Worley
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 10:05 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: i2...@ietf.org;
Francis:
Thank you for the reviewing this document.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: Francis Dupont [mailto:francis.dup...@fdupont.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:22 AM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-trill-irb@ietf.org
Subject: review of draft-ietf-trill-irb-13.txt
I am
Jari:
The authors are in California. You will not see their response until after
the IESG meeting.
Sue Hares
(shepherd)
-Original Message-
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 6:08 AM
To: Francis Dupont
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org;
Jari:
Thank you for your ping. I thought I answered this on March 6th, but alas I
did not. I send the response today.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 4:59 AM
To: Russ Housley
Cc:
Russ:
I apologize for the delayed response. I thought I had responded earlier. I
appreciate Jari's email that reminded me I had not sent this email.
The policy dictates that writes can come from a particular specific source,
but we are not requiring things to come on a particular channel.
Russ:
It is my recollection at version -09 of the architecture document answered
these issues. Please confirm this fact.
We are heading for a version-10 to resolve the security review given to us
in April.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: Russ Housley [mailto:hous...@vigilsec.com]
: draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-...@tools.ietf.org;
idr-cha...@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana (aretana); Mach Chen; Susan Hares;
General Area Review Team
Subject: Re: [IANA #818133] Last Call:
draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-bis-03.txt (Clarification of the
Flowspec Redirect Extended Community
Jeff:
Yes, that is the best plan.
Sue
From: Jeff Haas [mailto:jh...@juniper.net]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 7:10 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: drafts-lastc...@iana.org;
draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-rt-...@tools.ietf.org; idr-cha...@ietf.org;
Alvaro Retana (aretana); Mach Chen
Joel:
Answers below to your questions:
-Original Message-
From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:28 PM
To: A. Jean Mahoney; gen-art@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence@tools.ietf.org
Cc: IETF discussion list;
Vijay:
As the document shepherd this same phrase struck me a different way so I let
it go forward.
This document is not a panacea, nor is it a deep and
thorough approach to flap reduction.
My understanding is that some authors (researchers and engineers) were from
Japan. As careful
Jon and Elwyn:
I would like to make a correction here. The WG as a body of experts
suggested to the author via the Author to IANA. Perhaps as a body of
experts, this WG is sufficient to begin this range. Second, the suggestion
from the chairs is that IANA might want to allocate a portion of
Elwyn and Jon:
This is an IETF consensus about the draft range. As such, it should be put
in the draft as Jon indicated. As a shepherd and a co-chair, my comment to
the IANA team is that perhaps they should consider handling out a portion of
the whole space.
Once it is out, no one ever says
Elwyn:
Thanks for sending in the review.
Sue
-Original Message-
From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elw...@dial.pipex.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:28 AM
To: General Area Review Team
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-as0@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Spam:***, Gen-art LC review of
34 matches
Mail list logo
