Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, INTRODUCTION: >> Q2:In the Introduction, before the first sentence, shouldn't >> there be some background text, including some information about the >> problem that the document solves. I know there is something in the >> Abstract, but I think there should also be something in the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

W dniu 01.02.2017 o 21:57, Christer Holmberg pisze: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by > the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like > any other last call comments. > H

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, You suggestions look good, and I am happy with your reply :) Regards, Christer -Original Message- From: kkinnear [mailto:kkinn...@cisco.com] Sent: 02 February 2017 01:07 To: Christer Holmberg Cc: Kim Kinnear ; gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol@tools.ie

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Christer, I have deleted the issues not under discussion. More comments, indented, below... > On Feb 1, 2017, at 5:57 PM, Christer Holmberg > wrote: > > Hi, > >> >>> Q3:In the Introduction, I suggest adding a reference to the first >>> occurrences of “DHCP service” and “DHCP server

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Hi, >I will make all of the changes that you suggest, and have offered details >(indented) below. Note that while I'm willing to make the change you have >discussed in Q3, I don't >actually understand what you would like us to do. > >More below... INTRODUCTION: >> Q1:In the first se

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Thanks for the review Christer. And thanks for taking care of this quickly Kim. Regards Suresh > On Feb 1, 2017, at 11:43 PM, kkinnear wrote: > > >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >> Thanks for your review, Christer! >> >> Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

> On Feb 1, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > Thanks for your review, Christer! > > Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? Yes, I have agreed to make all of the changes suggested by Christer. Thanks -- Kim > > Jari > > On 01 Feb 2017, at 21:57, Christ

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Christer, Thanks for your review. I will make all of the changes that you suggest, and have offered details (indented) below. Note that while I'm willing to make the change you have discussed in Q3, I don't actually understand what you would like us to do. More below... > On Feb 1, 2017, at 3

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

Thanks for your review, Christer! Authors, can you make a note of the editorials? Jari On 01 Feb 2017, at 21:57, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for t

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at