t; To: Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Vince Mammoliti'; 'Gray, Eric';
> Gen-ART@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Re: draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt
>
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > If it's FCFS, it would be a violation of RFC 2234 to i
, June 14, 2006 8:18 AM
--> To: Mark Townsley
--> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Vince Mammoliti'; 'Gray, Eric';
--> Gen-ART@ietf.org
--> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Re: draft-arberg-pppoe-iana-01.txt
-->
--> If it's FCFS, it would be a violation of RFC
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
If it's FCFS, it would be a violation of RFC 2234 to insist
on a normative reference, I think.
Sounds like Informative is the way to go here.
Brian
Mark Townsley wrote:
Peter Arberg wrote:
Hi,
thanks Eric for the review and the good change suggestions.
I have
Peter,
Thanks for promptly completing these changes.
The draft version you attached satisfies the minor
comments I had provided. This draft will be completely
ready for submission to the RFC Editor for publishing as
a BCP RFC - as soon as Mark Townsley is satisfied with
the resol
If it's FCFS, it would be a violation of RFC 2234 to insist
on a normative reference, I think.
Brian
Mark Townsley wrote:
Peter Arberg wrote:
Hi,
thanks Eric for the review and the good change suggestions.
I have updated the document with all your suggestions, and attached
it for referen
