[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)]

2006-01-02 Thread Leo Simons
Brett's message from a while back which may be of interest to bill. There's more in this thread... LSD - Forwarded message from Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:45:56 +1100 Subject: Re: Maven 2

Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)

2005-11-18 Thread Brett Porter
On 11/19/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maven is in the center of the developers for a project (they type "mvn" > and not "gump") so what these people want to author is a POM. Gump should > read that POM and understand it. Sorry, I probably didn't explain where I was coming from. Mave

Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)

2005-11-18 Thread Leo Simons
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:10:24PM +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > > Why do you keep referring to a something.xml? Is it going to be a lot > > easier to have the maven jar resolver read a something.xml rather than do > > something else (like, I dunno, a database, or an XML/RPC interface, or > > ...)?

Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)

2005-11-18 Thread Brett Porter
On 11/18/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bing! Light bulb went on in my head. Pull not push. I'm trying to think > about an easy way to do the pull stuff, but that is probably all dependent > on the mechanisms maven employs. I'm pretty sure I can do this. > > Both gump and maven 2 are

Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)

2005-11-18 Thread Leo Simons
I missed a bit.. On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:27:53PM +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > On 11/16/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wrote an answer then deleted it. I got lost a little. Seperating concerns: > > > > --> support for maven2 in gump2 > > --> I'm not going to work on it >

Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)

2005-11-18 Thread Leo Simons
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:27:53PM +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > Yes, but you are going to have to go the other way around. It's a > component that resolves artifacts and metadata. It doesn't get fed, it > hunts. Bing! Light bulb went on in my head. Pull not push. I'm trying to think about an easy

Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)

2005-11-18 Thread Brett Porter
On 11/16/05, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wrote an answer then deleted it. I got lost a little. Seperating concerns: > > --> support for maven2 in gump2 > --> I'm not going to work on it Fine by me. I assume gump3 is not far off then? > --> how to properly support maven2 in

Re: Maven 2

2005-11-18 Thread Brett Porter
I'll be more specific. If M2_HOME is set, then that is where the main libraries are located from (its the install directory). You can run without it, eg /some/random/install/bin/mvn and it will use /some/random/install as the home directory. For ~/.m2 - the default location of settings.xml is ~/.

Re: Maven 2

2005-11-18 Thread Brett Porter
On 11/17/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing that bothers me with Maven 1 from a Gump point of view is > that I don't have any way to override jars that come bundled with > Maven unless projects declare a dependency on them. That's the same in m2, but its what you want as thi

RE: Maven 2

2005-11-18 Thread Jörg Schaible
Leo Simons wrote on Friday, November 18, 2005 9:49 AM: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 12:20:39AM -0800, Bill Barker wrote: [snip] >> I believe that both the Maven1 and Maven2 scripts use $MAVEN_HOME, >> which is the biggest problem with just creating a tag for >> Gump2. There are also problems with s

Re: Maven 2

2005-11-18 Thread Leo Simons
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 12:20:39AM -0800, Bill Barker wrote: > "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> --> support for maven2 in gump2 > >> --> I'm not going to work on it > > > >

Re: Maven 2

2005-11-18 Thread Bill Barker
"Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> --> support for maven2 in gump2 >> --> I'm not going to work on it > > I'd offer to do a monkey-see-monkey-do support if it is not too > different

Re: Maven 2

2005-11-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because it has an even more online nature (plugins are not > preinstalled), to use an installed version we'd again need to create > a minimal local repository including those plugins, then use offline > mode (-o), and ensure it can't g

Re: Maven 2

2005-11-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --> support for maven2 in gump2 > --> I'm not going to work on it I'd offer to do a monkey-see-monkey-do support if it is not too different from maven 1 support. In general I agree that gump3 is the way to go and that we should

Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)

2005-11-16 Thread Leo Simons
I wrote an answer then deleted it. I got lost a little. Seperating concerns: --> support for maven2 in gump2 --> I'm not going to work on it --> support for maven2 in gump3 --> pretty much like we did for maven1 + bootstrap --> doing it quickly --> not me -->

Re: Maven 2 (was Re: Maven 1.1)

2005-11-15 Thread Brett Porter
Ok, here's the opportunity for me to write the mail in my head. Aside from the non-existance of a gump machine right now, what is needed to use Maven 2, a) minimally b) ideally Because it has an even more online nature (plugins are not preinstalled), to use an installed version we'd again need to