On 13/05/11 05:52, Milind Bhandarkar wrote:
Ok, my mistake. They have only asked for documented specifications. I may
have been influenced by all the specifications I have read. All of them
were in English, which is characterized as a natural language.
But then, if you are proposing a
On 13/05/11 23:57, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
But distribution Z includes X kind of implies the existence of some such
that X != Y, Y != empty-set and X+Y = Z, at least in common usage.
Isn't that the same as a non-trunk change?
So doesn't this
On 13/05/11 23:16, Doug Cutting wrote:
On 05/14/2011 12:13 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
So what do we do about companies that release a product that says includes Apache
Hadoop but includes patches that aren't committed to trunk?
We yell at them to get those patches into trunk already. This
On 13/05/11 07:16, Doug Cutting wrote:
Certification semms like mission creep. Our mission is to produce
open-source software. If we wish to produce testing software, that
seems fine. But running a certification program for non-open-source
software seems like a different task.
+1
That
But Cloudera's release is a bit murky.
The math example is a bit flawed...
X represents the set of stable releases.
Y represents the set of available patches.
C represents the set of Cloudera releases.
So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set of patches that is contained in Y,
Then does it
When Reducers start running during a certain job
(mapred.reduce.slowstart.completed.maps = 0.8) it takes about 20 minutes before
the DN stopd reacting. This seems to be due to a number of Exceptions in the TT
- at least, it's the only place I'm seeing errors. The three recurring ones are
Hi all,
What acceptance tests are people using when buying clusters for Hadoop? Any
pointers to relevant methods?
Thanks,
Evert Lammerts
On May 16, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Evert Lammerts wrote:
Hi all,
What acceptance tests are people using when buying clusters for Hadoop? Any
pointers to relevant methods?
We get some test nodes from various manufacturers. We do some raw IO
benchmarking vs. our other nodes. We add
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Allen Wittenauer a...@apache.org wrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 5:00 AM, Segel, Mike wrote:
X represents the set of stable releases.
Y represents the set of available patches.
C represents the set of Cloudera releases.
So if C contains a release X(n) plus a set
On May 16, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Allen,
There are few things in Hadoop in CDH that are not in trunk,
branch-20-security, or branch-20-append. The stuff in this category
is not major (eg HADOOP-6605, better JAVA_HOME detection).
But that's my point: when is it no
Does Hadoop compatibility and the ability to say includes Apache
Hadoop only apply when we're talking about MR and HDFS APIs?
It is confusing isn't it.
We could go down the route java did and say that the API's are 'hadoop' and
ours is just a reference implementation of it. (but
Hey,
We've got a great group coming together again on Wednesday for an Apache
Hadoop Hackathon in Palo Alto and San Francisco. Sign up at
http://hadoophackathon.eventbrite.com.
As a reminder, we'll have Nigel Daley, the release manager for 0.22, present
in Palo Alto. If you have build and
Any chance for something in the east (NYC) or do I need to start nagging the
wife and kids that west coast weather is the way to go?
I will post on the NYC HUG maybe we can get some Hack together contrib to
Hadoop but maybe some evening/day that a few commiters on this list that
are in NYC
On trademarks, what about the phrase: New distribution for Apache
Hadoop? I've seen that used, and its something that replaces most of the
stack. I believe Apache Hadoop is trademarked in this context, even if
Hadoop alone isn't.
Compatible with Apache Hadoop is a smaller issue, defining some
We have the following method coverage:
Common ~60%
HDFS ~80%
MR ~70%
(better analysis will be available after our projects are connected to
Sonar, I think).
While method coverage isn't completely adequate answer to your
question, I'd say there is a possibility to sneak in some
My understanding is that a history if defending your trade mark is more
important than registration. Apache does defend Hadoop.
---
E14 - typing on glass
On May 16, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Segel, Mike mse...@navteq.com wrote:
Let me clarify...
I searched on Hadoop as a term in any TM.
Nothing
On trademarks, what about the phrase: New distribution for Apache
Hadoop? I've seen that used, and its something that
replaces most of the stack. [...] A proprietary derivative work with
most of the guts replaced is not an Apache Hadoop distribution, nor
a distribution for Apache Hadoop.
17 matches
Mail list logo
