5 4 2 6 3 1
- Aaron
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
> My vote:
>
> 5,4,3,2,6,1
>
> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
> in 4.
>
4, 2, 6
Yes. That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
the mustard for various reasons. 5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
think the others make the required visual case.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu <
amar...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
5, 2, 4, 6, 1, 3
Doug
On 06/15/2011 05:19 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
>We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a singl
On 15/06/11 02:15, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
I run out of fingers if I count how many times just the mapred.map.child.java.opts was
said to be "in 20" prior to the 0.20.203 release...]
yeah, that incident involving Camshaft 3.02 beta and your left hand
really reduced your counting ability.
On 15/06/11 03:51, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 19:46, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an
enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying
tha
On 15/06/11 00:35, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
A minor nit: I'd like to see some cleanup between the first paragraph and the
fourth paragraph in compatibility. Or was the re-iteration of our "not a standards
committee" intentional? It is sort of awkward as it is currently written.
well
On 15/06/11 04:19, Owen O'Malley wrote:
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
on a page, here:
http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
my vote: 4, 5, 2
5 6 4 2 3 1
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single ro
5 only
-dhruba
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Harsh J wrote:
> 5 6 4 2 3 1
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-p
5 6 2 1 4 3
2011/6/15 Dhruba Borthakur
> 5 only
>
> -dhruba
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Harsh J wrote:
>
> > 5 6 4 2 3 1
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley
> wrote:
> > > All,
> > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > all
On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
Sorry, I should have been clearer. Everyone is allowed and encouraged to vote.
Only the PMC votes are binding, however.
-- Owen
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in
> 4.
Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest in
adopting it.
-- Owen
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
> When casting your vote, please keep in mind that the vast majority of the
> time the "Powered By" logo will be displayed in a size much smaller than
> what is displayed on Owen's link.
That's a really good point Aaron. The fonts in all of the
On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> 4, 2, 6
>
> Yes. That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
> the mustard for various reasons. 5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
> think the others make the required visual case.
+1
4,2,6
4,5,1,2,6,3
Devaraj K
-Original Message-
From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omal...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:04 PM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Who is allowed to vote in this? Commi
On 06/15/2011 07:44 AM, Harsh J wrote:
5 6 4 2 3 1
My vote
5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 2
--
Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda
Software Engineer (UCI)
http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com
http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186
My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6
Tom
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
> All,
>We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a s
My vote: 5, 4, 2, 6, 3, 1
On 6/15/11 8:55 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote:
On 06/15/2011 07:44 AM, Harsh J wrote:
5 6 4 2 3 1
My vote
5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 2
My vote 5 3 6 1 2 4
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Graves wrote:
> My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
>
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org
5 2 1 3 6 4
On 15 June 2011 08:54, Eli Collins wrote:
> My vote 5 3 6 1 2 4
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Graves
> wrote:
> > My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>We've had a wide range of entries for a pow
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:52, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 15/06/11 03:51, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 19:46, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> 4, 2, 6
>
> Yes. That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
> the mustard for various reasons. 5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
> think the others make the required visual case.
5 is not a product logo, nor w
4,5,6,3,2,1
PS: Powered logo would be advertised by users. Their vote should count :)
- Original Message
From: Owen O'Malley
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:19:18 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>> Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an
>> enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying
>> that they are using Hadoop? You've pa
4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 3
Tom
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>
>> Wrt derivative works, it's not clear from the document, but I think we
>> should explicitly adopt the policy of HTTPD and Subversion that
>> backported patches from trunk and security fix
My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3
--Jeff
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
> All,
>We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a
On 15/06/11 17:23, Eli Collins wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an
enhancement to their current Hadoop build and tell them to stop saying
that the
My vote: 2, 4, 5, 6, 3, 1.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only
My vote:
5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Naisbitt [mailto:jnais...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3
--Jeff
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
> All
2 6 5 1 4 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Anupam Seth wrote:
> My vote:
>
> 5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Naisbitt [mailto:jnais...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM
> To: general@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 15/06/11 17:23, Eli Collins wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
Are we really going to go after all the web companies that patch in an
>>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest
> in adopting it.
>
On that note, is it the case that the outcome of this vote is to adopt the
"style" of the winning option? Or the precise pixels? I assume the for
5, 4, 2, 6
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single rou
2, 4
On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
> All,
>We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
> On that note, is it the case that the outcome of this vote is to adopt the
> "style" of the winning option? Or the precise pixels? I assume the former.
It is about the style. Technically, it would require a vote to replace the
precise pixels,
5, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas
wrote:
> 2, 4
>
>
> On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
>
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-
2, 4, 6.
mahadev
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> 5, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas
> wrote:
>> 2, 4
>>
>>
>> On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've
Eli, you said:
> Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same
> category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not
> gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who
> contribute to and invest in the project.
How would you phrase
4, 2
Regards,
Tsz-Wo
From: Owen O'Malley
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:19:18 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
on
a page, here:
http://people.ap
Oh, and while I can't officially vote, I think this page is extremely well done
and
I strongly support it.
As an editorial note, however, I would remove the last paragraph in the
"Compatibility"
section, referencing the email thread (that I contributed to at length :-) ).
That thread went a
+1 to what Eli says. If nobody is running official Hadoop according to this
definition, but everybody thinks that they are running hadoop, then this
definition is a bit out of whack. The source of the dissonance is related
to the fact that release just don't happen often enough in Hadoop.
In add
No offense taken.
Sanjay and I chatted offline. We disagree on whether Private should be
scoped to the whole project (Hadoop), or to subprojects (Common, HDFS,
MapReduce). The intent of HADOOP-5073 was for the latter, but I'm not
convinced it buys us anything really, which is why I've been arguing
5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a sing
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> For those people who aren't on the Apache Incubator mailing lists, Tom
> White has proposed "BigTop", which is the tooling to integrate the build and
> testing of the Apache Hadoop technologies, perhaps eventually to have
> coordinated rele
On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of
anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By
this definition many of the most valuable contributors to Hadoop,
including Yahoo!, Cloudera, Facebook, etc ar
4, 2, 6, 1
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:22 AM, James Warren <
james.war...@stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
> 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
>
6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
> My vote:
>
> 5,4,3,2,6,1
>
> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in
> 4.
>
Hadoop fans,
Last week we held another successful San Francisco Hadoop "unconference"
meetup at RichRelevance's office.
Discussion topics included:
* Working with multiple Hadoop clusters
* HBase
* Hive SerDes and evolving data formats
* Zookeeper and Leader Election
* Timeseries databases / stat
2, 4
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bochun Bai wrote:
> 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
> > My vote:
> >
> > 5,4,3,2,6,1
> >
> > IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
> in 4.
> >
>
4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5
On 06/15/2011 11:54 AM, Bartosz Solowiej wrote:
2, 4
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bochun Bai wrote:
6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
My vote:
5,4,3,2,6,1
IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
4, 2, 6
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>> For those people who aren't on the Apache Incubator mailing lists, Tom
>> White has proposed "BigTop", which is the tooling to integrate the build and
>> testing of the Apache Hadoop
4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5
Thanks,
Richa
2,4,6,1,3,5
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, M. C. Srivas wrote:
> 4, 2, 6, 1
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:22 AM, James Warren <
> james.war...@stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
>
> > 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley
> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > > We've had a
2 4 6 5 3 1
I only like 4. A more polished version would be great. Maybe with
"Hadoop" instead of "Apache Hadoop". And maybe with a different font :)
On 06/15/11 16:35, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
>
>> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the wh
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>
>> I've spoken with ops teams at many companies, I am not aware of
>> anyone who runs an official release (with just 2 security patches). By
>> this definition many of the most valuable c
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> But Yahoo! hasn't. According to this wiki YDH (0.20.100) would *not*
> be considered Apache Hadoop. For example see HADOOP-6962 which refers
> to 0.20.9, an internal Yahoo! release, not an official Apache release.
> Are you really comfortable
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>> But Yahoo! hasn't. According to this wiki YDH (0.20.100) would *not*
>> be considered Apache Hadoop. For example see HADOOP-6962 which refers
>> to 0.20.9, an internal Yahoo! release, n
2, 4, 5, 3, 6, 1
My vote: 2, 4, 5
-C
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a
5, 3, 2, 4, 6, 1
On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> My vote: 2, 4, 5
>
> -C
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~o
It should look something like this:
http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3
I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
I think whatever c
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Matthew Foley wrote:
> Eli, you said:
>> Putting a build of Hadoop that has 4 security patches applied into the same
>> category as a product that has entirely re-worked the code and not
>> gotten it checked into trunk does a major disservice to the people who
>>
What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudni
2 4 5 6 1 3
I tend to agree with what I think you are saying, that
* applying a small-number-of-patches that are
* for high-severity-bug-fixes, and
* have been Apache-Hadoop-committed
to an Apache Hadoop release should not demote the result to a "derived work".
However, if so many pa
It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
The feather would classy on that background too.
And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
--Konstantin
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscl
6,2,4
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
wrote:
> It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> The feather would classy on that background too.
> And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
> --Konstantin
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstan
Hi Matthew,
I'm sorry I have to disagree.
If you change a bit in a work, it becomes a derived work. There's no
"demotion" involved. Just a definition of derived work.
There's no ambiguity. Either you ship the bits that the Apache PMC has
voted on as a release, or you change it (one bit) an
2.
Yep, the feather is bit argh.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Ken Goodhope wrote:
> 6,2,4
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
> wrote:
>
> > It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> > The feather would classy on that background too.
> > And children
So to second a point here.
We are not saying you can't patch your distribution, add your own features,
share it with your friends, or do whatever you want to the code.
all we're saying is that you can't call that 'Apache Hadoop'.
On Jun 16, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Matth
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 18:30, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> The feather would classy on that background too.
> And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
Yeah, lotta heavy lifting here for sure...
> --Konstantin
>
> On W
Hey all,
My vote.. 6,3,5,4,2,1
Thanks,
Kyoji KATO
On 15 June 2011 12:19, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contender
It does make sense to me to distinguish between the case when a company seeks
to benefit from using the Hadoop name for their product and the case when a
company uses Hadoop internally with some minor patches.
For example: large company creates a game-show playing appliance and explains
that th
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> There's no ambiguity. Either you ship the bits that the Apache PMC has
> voted on as a release, or you change it (one bit) and it is no longer what
> the PMC has voted on. It's a derived work.
>
> The rules for voting in Apache require that
On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Craig L Russell
> wrote:
>
>> There's no ambiguity. Either you ship the bits that the Apache PMC has
>> voted on as a release, or you change it (one bit) and it is no longer what
>> the PMC has voted on. It's a de
4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5
5, 6, 4, 2, 3, 1
esteban.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Kyoji KATO wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> My vote.. 6,3,5,4,2,1
>
> Thanks,
> Kyoji KATO
>
> On 15 June 2011 12:19, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page
2
St.Ack
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> so yes .. even a simple patch makes it derived, because it is different.
>
...and a "dervied work" is fine. Nothing inherently wrong with the term
derived. I think the question is can one call it "Hadoop?" Note I'm *not*
saying "Apache Hado
82 matches
Mail list logo
