Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5

2013-05-10 Thread Konstantin Shvachko
Chris, Not everybody who is voting now provided context in the discussion thread. You did. And I am sorry I did not understand it. Formally, bylaws void only vetos with no explanations. So I agree it is not required in this vote as there are no vetos. Wouldn't it be good to know though. --Konst

Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5

2013-05-10 Thread Konstantin Shvachko
Vinod, I did ask Arun for the set of features for the release, and did ask to put it on vote. It is deep in the discussion thread, but you can find it. Thank you for voting, --Konst On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli vino...@hortonworks.com wrote: Confused and thought

Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5

2013-05-10 Thread Arun C Murthy
On May 9, 2013, at 10:03 PM, Uma Maheswara Rao G wrote: Adding new features really a great thing and surely each big feature can be included in one one major release as well. Surely the one thing we have learnt over the last 4-5 years in this project is that we cannot make too many major

Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5

2013-05-10 Thread Stack
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Konstantin Shvachko shv.had...@gmail.comwrote: Please vote on the following plan for Hadoop release 2.0.5 - bug fixes encountered in current release 2.0.4-alpha - make all API changes to allow freezing them post 2.0.5 - no new features +1 I love the new

Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5

2013-05-10 Thread Stack
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: On May 9, 2013, at 10:03 PM, Uma Maheswara Rao G wrote: Adding new features really a great thing and surely each big feature can be included in one one major release as well. Surely the one thing we have learnt

Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5

2013-05-10 Thread Chris Douglas
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Konstantin Shvachko shv.had...@gmail.com wrote: Not everybody who is voting now provided context in the discussion thread. You did. And I am sorry I did not understand it. I'll try to be clearer. It's unnecessary for you to ask permission to roll a release

Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5

2013-05-10 Thread Andrew Purtell
It would seem to a humble outsider that project formalism and procedure is not the issue, instead that is expectations and impact on the outside world. We hear that branch-2 is approaching stability, except when it isn't, as evidenced by new downstream project unit test failures at each minor

Re: [VOTE] Release plan for Hadoop 2.0.5

2013-05-10 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
That's a problem, if it isn't in the vote as to what feature in progress is being proposed to be included and what is excluded, how can we expect to vote? Thanks, +Vinod On May 9, 2013, at 11:39 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: Vinod, I did ask Arun for the set of features for the release,