Can any committer with knowledge of HOD please review this patch?
If there are no committers with such knowledge, I would encourage us to
either (a) add a committer to maintain hod, or (b) reconsider the vote to
abandon it as an official contrib. Perhaps Simone and Gianluigi could move
it to a
For closure, this vote fails due to a binding -1 vote.
Nige
On Feb 18, 2011, at 6:40 AM, Simone Leo wrote:
I am the co-author (with Gianluigi Zanetti) of HADOOP-6369 -- add Grid
Engine support to HOD. At CRS4 we've been using (our patched version of)
HOD since 2008 and we still use it in
I am the co-author (with Gianluigi Zanetti) of HADOOP-6369 -- add Grid
Engine support to HOD. At CRS4 we've been using (our patched version of)
HOD since 2008 and we still use it in production. We use Hadoop 0.20.2
since it was released one year ago.
Simone
On 02/12/11 06:15, Owen O'Malley
Hemanth Yamijala and myself were the main contributors to HOD.
Answers to few of the questions:
- IIRC, Hod needed python 2.5 (or some such latest) which was not
available on Hudson. The tests gracefully run only when that version is
available. We always used to run these tests on dev boxes
On 11/02/2011 02:51, Nigel Daley wrote:
I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's last
meaningful contribution was February 2009:
HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop services
provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush Bishnoi.
There
On Feb 10, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's last
meaningful contribution was February 2009:
HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop services
provisioned by HOD. Contributed by Peeyush
On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Feb 10, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's last
meaningful contribution was February 2009:
HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop
On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so
including it would likely only be a burden on the tarball size.
Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our builds
have dependencies on python.
But Allen's point is
On Feb 11, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
On Feb 11, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
a) I don't think hod is actually part of any unit tests, so including it
would likely only be a burden on the tarball size.
Not true. HOD has python unit tests and is the reason our
+1
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com wrote:
I think the PMC should abandon the hod common contrib component. It's last
meaningful contribution was February 2009:
HADOOP-2898. Provide an option to specify a port range for Hadoop services
provisioned by HOD.
10 matches
Mail list logo
