RE: JIRAs post-unsplit

2011-06-14 Thread Rottinghuis, Joep
components are involved a new HADOOPX- referring to such earlier Jira? Cheers, Joep From: Todd Lipcon [t...@cloudera.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:37 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRAs post-unsplit On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM

Re: JIRAs post-unsplit

2011-06-14 Thread Todd Lipcon
to such earlier Jira? Cheers, Joep From: Todd Lipcon [t...@cloudera.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:37 PM To: general@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: JIRAs post-unsplit On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: I

Re: JIRAs post-unsplit

2011-06-13 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. I'd rather keep the current JIRA split in effect (e.g. separate JIRA projects for separate Hadoop components; don't recombine them) and file patches in the same way (for common, hdfs, mapreduce). If a cross component patch is needed

Re: JIRAs post-unsplit

2011-06-13 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 01:37PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. I'd rather keep the current JIRA split in effect (e.g. separate JIRA projects for separate

Re: JIRAs post-unsplit

2011-06-13 Thread Todd Lipcon
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 01:37PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: I tend to agree: JIRA separation was the benefit of the split. I'd rather keep