We just need to get the infrastructure guys on board.
I'll prepare a notification and pre-prepare a "its been 3 months and no
movement has happened" flame ... ;-)
-Andy
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Now that we've reached consensus, the Maven team has written a SuperXMaver
plugin, by taking all the best ideas, I mean forking the source code, and
refuses to let anyone else commit to the new SuperXMaver features.
Dion I'm glad to see maven covering the important feature of mail
harvestin
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:12 pm, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > When will you guys ever get a clue?
>
> I must say that this entire thread made my day. It is *nice* to see
> this group of people collaborating.
>
We just need to get the infrastructure guys on board.
Conor
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When will you guys ever get a clue?
I must say that this entire thread made my day. It is *nice* to see
this group of people collaborating.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/04/2003 11:17:05 AM:
> >
> >
> >
> >Andy, as usual, you're making mountains out of molehills. There IS
broad
> >agreement - let's just go forward with this.
> >
> >
> Excellent! I'm glad we've reached a consensus!
Now that we've reached conse
Andy, as usual, you're making mountains out of molehills. There IS broad
agreement - let's just go forward with this.
Excellent! I'm glad we've reached a consensus!
-Andy
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:14 am, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Ben,
>
> You're being obstructionist. Lets not make this into a big political
> thing.
Andy, as usual, you're making mountains out of molehills. There IS broad
agreement - let's just go forward with this.
Conor
-
Ben,
You're being obstructionist. Lets not make this into a big political
thing. Its important that Apache have a mass mailing solution and its
great community project. We're even going to advance the state of
development through extensive use of UML, implement the CMM and utilize
the grand
No way, not until the board clarifies project's reply-to header policy.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:35 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
GREAT! Add yourself as a committer to the wiki page! I'm glad there
is so much community enthusiasm for this!
Ben Hyde wrote:
+1, I'm seriously considering
GREAT! Add yourself as a committer to the wiki page! I'm glad there is
so much community enthusiasm for this!
Ben Hyde wrote:
+1, I'm seriously considering doing an Ada port!
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:03 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMai
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on acceptance into the
incubator. I'm sure that despite the inevitable controversy, f
+1, I'm seriously considering doing an Ada port!
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:03 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we wor
On 1/04/2003 22:03 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator.
:-D
Nice one!
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on acceptance into the
incubator. I'm sure that despite the inevitable controversy, folks will
see a true valu
14 matches
Mail list logo
