Re: BPEL

I'v just checked out the source and hanging around with the maven configurations. And I found that 'gluecode' is being used as maven group-id and artifact-id is missing. I think we should remove the 'gluecode' from agila, isn't it? On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:26:44 -0700, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL

Re: Switch to Forrest 0.6?

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Forrest has _finally_ made a release, version 0.6. We are now using a > snapshot, but a release is better, especially for those that author > docs. Furthermore with 0.6 we can simply use html docs as source, and > this would also make our source files easily readable.

Re: Mentor and Project Guide (WAS: RE: [OT] How to prevent...)

Ted Husted wrote: > Jaaron, > > Either place is fine with me. Though, now that you mention it, > the wiki might be a more collaborative place to start. I presume that these new documents are going to be at the Incubator website under control of SVN. When i hear people say "start at the wiki" i

Re: Mentor and Project Guide (WAS: RE: [OT] How to prevent...)

Jaaron, Either place is fine with me. Though, now that you mention it, the wiki might be a more collaborative place to start. Here's another old link with some material we could incorporate: * http://jakarta.apache.org/site/guides.html Though it now overlaps with material available elsewhere.

RE: Mentor and Project Guide (WAS: RE: [OT] How to prevent...)

Cliff Schmidt wrote > If it's any use, you can download the slides at: > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2004/view/e_sess/5439 > I'll be giving a similar presentation next month at ApacheCon. I'll be there to heckle. ;-) Actually, the presentation looks pretty good. :-) --- Noe

RE: Mentor and Project Guide (WAS: RE: [OT] How to prevent...)

> Cliff Schmidt wrote: > > > I gave a 45-minute presentation on Apache and the Incubator at > > the O'Reilly Open Source Convention last July. If it's any use, > > you can download the slides at: > > http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2004/view/e_sess/5439 > > (.ppt format -- if there's any i

Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

thorsten wrote: > Thanks Ted for doing that. > > This kind of document I had in mine. You have been smarter then me. Thanks to everyone for re-starting this again. We need to distill the wealth of knowledge to provide guidelines. Thorsten, because you were brave enough to raise such thorny issues

RE: Mentor and Project Guide (WAS: RE: [OT] How to prevent...)

Resending same post under the other renamed thread. My previous post unintentionally started a second renamed thread -- didn't notice this one ("Mentor and Project Guide") until after I sent it. Cliff Cliff Schmidt wrote on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:23 PM: > I gave a 45-minute presentation on

Improving Incubator documentation (was RE: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges)

I gave a 45-minute presentation on Apache and the Incubator at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention last July. If it's any use, you can download the slides at: http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2004/view/e_sess/5439 (.ppt format -- if there's any interest I can convert to html or .pdf).

RE: Castle proposal

Sorry for the late reply. I thought it was more appropriate to reply to this thread rather than the [VOTE] thread if I was primarily asking a question/voicing a concern... >From the proposal and a quick look at the SF sites, I get the impression that there isn't much of a community behind this

Re: Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:40:47 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have > > migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significa

Re: Mentor and Project Guide (WAS: RE: [OT] How to prevent...)

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:26:22 -0400 (EDT), J Aaron Farr wrote: > How big were you thinking of making this?  Your outline suggests > several pages at least.  Or were you thinking of just one page? It should be as short as we make make it, but no shorter :) > I had been thinking of putting together

Re: Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:01 PM -0700 Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm happy w/ svn. I really wish I had some minimal support in IDEA, but "svn stat" and "svn move" make up for it :) HTH. -- justin --

Re: Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:40 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significantly higher amount of churn caused to

Percentage of projects using Subversion was Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

--On Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:56 PM -0400 Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have migrated to SVN so far? There would be a significantly higher amount of churn caused to the community by an SVN migration than was caused by our

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Wednesday 20 October 2004 01:56, Neil Graham wrote: > I'd also be curious to know what proportion of Apache projects have > migrated to SVN so far? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ Is the current complete set of projects migrated, some larger than others. Niclas -- +--//

Re: BPEL

On Oct 18, 2004, at 8:50 AM, Hookom, Jacob wrote: Is there anything going on with the Business Process project? I just got the first drop of code in svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/agila/trunk/ There is no docs, and pieces are still missing, but we'll keep contributing here :) I

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Hi David, > > So would this be an appropriate time to move the > xml-commons repository to SVN? Well, I don't know about you, but I generally prefer to ease my way into new software tools, rather than dive right into advanced usage. So, speaking for myself, I'd prefer to wait for a period of

Switch to Forrest 0.6?

Forrest has _finally_ made a release, version 0.6. We are now using a snapshot, but a release is better, especially for those that author docs. Furthermore with 0.6 we can simply use html docs as source, and this would also make our source files easily readable. The only thing that I'm unsure o

Re: Mentor and Project Guide (WAS: RE: [OT] How to prevent...)

J Aaron Farr wrote: ... I suppose this is going to be authored in Forrest or perhaps Docbook. Do it in Forrest so it goes in the Incubator Docs; you can do it simply in html... just use the .ihtml extension. ... On a final note, I don't believe I have any SVN commit rights to anything in the incu

Mentor and Project Guide (WAS: RE: [OT] How to prevent...)

> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 4:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:28:56 -0400, J Aaron Farr wrote: > > Where are you working on this? I'

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

On Oct 19, 2004, at 1:40 AM, Neeraj Bajaj wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: This is an update to the existing code that is already there. It is, I suppose, a new grant of software to an existing community, so I think that what we need is the grant documentation from Sun*, have that entered int

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I worked on the some of the legal aspects with Eduardo, so going to jump in here. On Oct 13, 2004, at 3:59 PM, Berin Lautenbach wrote: Neeraj Bajaj wrote: Hello All, I was wondering when can we start merging the JAXP 1.3 sources ? Merging the code in branch/review/te

Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache

Neeraj Bajaj wrote: > > I checked on this one, This work involves legal and is being worked with > legal now. > I guess this process would take some time so wanted to update the > community about the status. So would this be an appropriate time to move the xml-commons repository to SVN? -- Da

Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

Thanks Ted for doing that. This kind of document I had in mine. You have been smarter then me. I want to help as well!!! spot thorsten Ted Husted wrote: On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:28:56 -0400, J Aaron Farr wrote: Where are you working on this? I'd love to help. jaaron We should probably work on it in

Re: [OT] How to prevent abusing Apache priviliges

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:28:56 -0400, J Aaron Farr wrote: > Where are you working on this?  I'd love to help. > > jaaron We should probably work on it in the Incubator repository. Perhaps as a standalone whiteboard document first, and then as the Projects page, when it's ready for prime time. If