On 1/18/06, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see roller already in SVN, is the development already going on in there ?
Yep.
> Based on the README.txt in SVN, you can scratch radeox as being LGPL. They
> switched to BSD...
> (at least one legal issue got solved automatically :)
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-11-24 00:30:24 -0500 (Thu, 24 Nov 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > >
> > > -- http://people.apache.org/~crossley/incubator-anakia/faq.html
> > >missing the questions!
>
> Ah thanks, this is a big problem.
>
> The converted xdocs have:
>
>
>
> Whereas i think that Geir's Anakia te
Gav wrote:
>
> Apologies if I have it wrong here, as I am new to this particular list, but
> does anyone
> take any notice of the Jira Issues for Incubator site?
> My patches and comments needed for me to provide more patches are only a few
> days
> old, I am used to quick turnaround of patc
Raphaël Luta wrote:
> > What specific concerns do you have with this community and this
codebase?
> - the mentor for this project is salaried by the project sponsor !
To date, we have said that an ASF Member is an individual, not an employeee.
Mind you, we're also discussing that a project SHOULD
Raphaël Luta wrote:
> I thought it would be safe to assume that Zimbra collaboration suite
> uses the AjaxTk. If it doesn't then I'm even more worried about that
> codebase ;)
Why?
>>>An established codebase is *much* more difficult to restructure
>>>than starting from scratch.
>> Apache SOAP
Hello all.
The current OFBiz project has a lot of material on marketing and
services. I'm wondering how the team anticipates they'll handle this
material during the incubation transition. We encourage commercial
use of ASF products and we support efforts to build companies around
them. So there
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >...
> >Can anyone see any other glitches in the conversion process?
>
> The anchors forrest generates for page sections are lost, so anything
> that references them don't work.
>
> For example, close to the end of the "Podling Constraints" sect
Upayavira wrote:
> Another concern IIRC was download size. I remember
> (possibly incorrectly) that the toolkit has quite a
> large download before it will work, while other
> toolkits download piecemeal as required.
That's certainly one approach. And there are good reasons
for doing it all to
David Crossley wrote:
...
Can anyone see any other glitches in the conversion process?
The anchors forrest generates for page sections are lost, so anything
that references them don't work.
For example, close to the end of the "Podling Constraints" section in
http://people.apache.org/~cross
Just a couple comments on Zimbra's motivations :-)
Zimbra has absolutely no commercial interest or monetization goals around its
Ajax toolkit. We are a collaboration software company and not a software tools
company. We do have a very strong interest in ensuring the success of Ajax in a
*non-pr
David Crossley wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
> >
> > -- http://people.apache.org/~crossley/incubator-anakia/faq.html
> >missing the questions!
Ah thanks, this is a big problem.
The converted xdocs have:
Whereas i think that Geir's Anakia template might be
expecting:
I will try to
Andrew Clark wrote:
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
>
>>can you just shortly reply to the technical questions
>>Martin Cooper has raised on this list? I do think he
>>has a valid point there, and I'd like to hear what you
>>have to say to that.
>
>
> I went back to the archives and re-read all of
For me, the first approach suffices.
regards,
Martin
On 1/18/06, Andrew Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > I don't recall anymore what he said specifically - did
> > he talk about namespacing? do you do that?
>
> I was unable to find anything specific to comment on.
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> I don't recall anymore what he said specifically - did
> he talk about namespacing? do you do that?
I was unable to find anything specific to comment on.
Most of Martin Cooper's comments in his posts were
about the technology being too immature and that he
felt (after l
Leo Simons wrote:
>
> Nothing to do with the conversion...but noting these as I clicked around...
>
> -- linkback to "ASF" is confusing right now
>
> -- http://people.apache.org/~crossley/incubator-anakia/resolution.html
>should probably point out how PMC roster and chair is different
>t
Leo Simons wrote:
> Dude,
>
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Here is the result of my experiment ...
> ...
> > Thanks to the Forrest project for the new abilities.
>
> +1. Amazing. Kudos to you and the other forrest peeps for turing complaints
> into feature requests and implementing the right bits. I
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> This is great. I've been A->B testing with the example I put on ~geir
> and things look good. I think some of my hand-done pages look better
> but that's because a) I did them by hand and b) I ain't gonna admit I
> was showed up by no fancy machine!
:-)
We can stil
Leo Simons wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:33:56PM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
I think this information should go in one of these places:
http://incubator.apache.org/learn/
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/
+1.
with more thought, guides would be the best fit; besides, there are
Leo Simons wrote:
>>Keep in mind that with the Incubator, perhaps only one or two people
>>might already have access to subversion.
> There's well over a hundred people with write access to the parts of incubator
> SVN where such stuff would live. If there's not enough of those people
> willing
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Sorry. The wiki made me do it :) I hope David's been around enough to
> understand I didn't intend to chasten. I suspect he was following
> recent examples (and I should have said something sooner...)
David hasn't been around the Incubator very long. I'm just trying
I don't recall anymore what he said specifically - did he talk about
namespacing?
do you do that?
regards,
Martin
On 1/18/06, Andrew Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > can you just shortly reply to the technical questions
> > Martin Cooper has raised on this list? I
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> can you just shortly reply to the technical questions
> Martin Cooper has raised on this list? I do think he
> has a valid point there, and I'd like to hear what you
> have to say to that.
I went back to the archives and re-read all of Martin's
posts on this topic but
Dims,
We normally vote on people on the private lists (pmc@, ppmc@). Everything
else is generally public.
In any event, +1 for him.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Martin,
Even if it hadn't, we'd remove it. The project simply never came in,
despite being approved. It stayed at tigris.org.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI
Hi everyone,
I was under the impression that being a mentor was just for ASF members, but couldn't find that
written down anywhere.
If it is not just a thing for ASF Members, I wouldn't mind freeing up some time to help out with
mentoring.
Mvgr,
Martin
---
About Axion : the db PMC is going to request removal of Axion (at least I pinged them about Axion
and that was the reply)..
Mvgr,
Martin
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Tobago came through with its report.
--- Noel
-
To unsub
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
As part of reviving juice, can we please VOTE werner as a committer to
enable him to continue his offline work? [1]
it is great to see this happening!
Here's my +1.
+1 (not sure if i have a binding vote for this)
best,
alek
[1] : http://www.nabble.com/Statu
On 1/17/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It shouldn't be buried deep in a subpage, nor should it be on a page
> that is already busy. http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html
> is borderline too busy and covers more than this one role.
>
> comments? feedback?
Looks good.
I subscribed to the roller user and dev list (found it at the bottom of the status html file..), so
you can reply there if it's more appropiate..
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
I see roller already in SVN, is the development already going on in there ?
Based on the README.txt in SVN,
I see roller already in SVN, is the development already going on in there ?
Based on the README.txt in SVN, you can scratch radeox as being LGPL. They
switched to BSD...
(at least one legal issue got solved automatically :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Henri Yandell wrote:
As many know, Roller releases have b
Andrew,
can you just shortly reply to the technical questions Martin Cooper
has raised on this list? I do think he has a valid point there, and
I'd like to hear what you have to say to that.
Plus, please add me in as a committer. If this is to be incubated, I'd
rather than not be part of it to be
David,
Looks nice. Great work! thanks. More feedback when i try out the build process.
-- dims
On 1/18/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Responding to some issues that people have with the
> layout of the current forrest-based website.
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~crossley/inc
On Jan 17, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Andrew Clark wrote:
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KabukiProposal
To be clear: +1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As many know, Roller releases have been happening outside the ASF on
the old site (rollerweblogger.org) with various incubating and
'not-ASF' statements added. These releases point to the non-ASF Roller
website, wiki and Jira. The reason being that Roller still has non-ASF
desirable dependencies in
As part of reviving juice, can we please VOTE werner as a committer to
enable him to continue his offline work? [1]
Here's my +1.
thanks,
dims
[1] : http://www.nabble.com/Status-of-my-upgrades-and-so-on-t945224.html
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
-
I know the vote is essentially over, but the following thought
occurred to me this morning as I volunteered to support the OfBiz
proposal.
On 1/11/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ] - Any new proposal should have 3 ASF Members / Officers as mentors
> (without regard to affiliat
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Geir (and all),
my name is Jacopo Cappellato, I'm one of the developers of the OFBiz
project and, as you can imagine, I'm very interested in your feedback
about our request to join the ASF Incubator.
About the proposal posted to the Wiki instead of to this list.
This is great. I've been A->B testing with the example I put on ~geir
and things look good. I think some of my hand-done pages look better
but that's because a) I did them by hand and b) I ain't gonna admit I
was showed up by no fancy machine!
Seriously - the cwiki pages were the last bit, I
- Original Message -
From: "Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| There's well over a hundred people with write access to the parts of
incubator
| SVN where such stuff would live. If there's not enough of those people
willing to
| handle the "apply patch" workload for this kind of stuff th
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community.
+1
But let's try to say such things to be educational, not chastising.
Sorry. The wiki made me do it :) I hope
The way I read them is that when a date is set, the task is completed.
Mvgr,
Martin
Henri Yandell wrote:
Dumb question. Are the completion dates on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/roller.html when the event
happened, or when it was marked as complete.
ie) to start ticking these things off
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Raphaël Luta wrote:
>
>>along with [a] codebase come an established group of committers
>>with an interest in keeping their current architecture or at
>>least backward compatibility
>
> That carries a fairly large assumption, and really should be posed as a
> question, no
Sam Ruby wrote:
> Raphaël Luta wrote:
>> Erik Abele wrote:
>>
>>> It's just the initial code, nothing more :)
>>
>> I don't agree with this statement.
>> The code itself is indeed only the initial codebase but along with
>> this codebase come an established group of committers with an
>> interest i
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:15:23AM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
>
> >>From an incubator point of view, one other alternative mechanism to "edit
> > on wiki, e-mail to list" would be "send to list, add to SVN, submit patches
> > to mailing list, commit patches to SVN, send to l
Dude,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:29:52PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
> Here is the result of my experiment ...
...
> Thanks to the Forrest project for the new abilities.
+1. Amazing. Kudos to you and the other forrest peeps for turing complaints
into feature requests and implementing the right b
Leo Simons wrote:
>>From an incubator point of view, one other alternative mechanism to "edit
> on wiki, e-mail to list" would be "send to list, add to SVN, submit patches
> to mailing list, commit patches to SVN, send to list". This is a bit more
> of a learning curve for people not yet used to w
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:33:56PM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> I think this information should go in one of these places:
>
>http://incubator.apache.org/learn/
>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/
+1.
I think there should also be something like a
svn cp
https://svn.apache.org/repo
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:03:14AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote:
> [changed subject line though I don't intend to have a big discussion
> about this topic]
Grr, I just did exactly the same thing and wrote just about the
same thing. My thread view must be messed up...
In any case, +1 to what he said.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 06:16:09PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki?
Seems like it.
> (or "@)#!)#@ wiki", as I tend to think of them...)
(LSD *hugs* wikipedia...)
> Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should b
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki? (or
> "@)#!)#@ wiki", as I tend to think of them...)
>
> Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
> 'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community. Feel free to
> a
51 matches
Mail list logo
