On 6/20/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/7/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was my plan as well; so I'm pretty flexible. I guess I'd
probably prefer not to schedule anything formal on Monday morning,
On 6/20/06, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll attend the Dublin conference, getting in Tuesday late morning.
I'm interested in contributing, especially to the sample incubator
project template in the area of template web site and template build
scripts based on maven. I
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0.1 release binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the release.
Release notes:
This has obviously been something we've been looking at in order to do
our own due diligence on XRI IPR before being willing to contribute the
Yadis spec to be incorporated into XRI Resolution 2.0. Drummond Reed
sent me the following email further explaining this issue and asked me
to forward it
+1 (binding) from me,.
-- dims
On 6/20/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0.1 release binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
Drummond,
Here's some background history of things that we have faced.
OpenSAML folks were interested in making OpenSAML an Apache project.
So we did a bit of research and realized that RSA Security has put up
a page asking folks to sign a patent licensing aggrement [1]. AFAIK,
SAML is also
+1 with incubator hat on
-Brian
On Jun 20, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 (binding) from me,.
-- dims
On 6/20/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0.1
On Jun 19, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
This proposal seeks to create a project within the Apache Software
Foundation to continue the development and advancement of Jini
technology. It has broad backing from the Jini Community, and
includes core developers from Sun Microsystems
Hello,
Below is a project proposal for incubation consideration.
The project welcomes your feedback as well as interest in involvement.
This proposal is also located online at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CeltiXfireProposal
== CeltiXfire Proposal ==
Project CeltiXfire is a SOA
Hola,
Cool overall. Would it be possible to detail the affiliations of the
(relatively large) initial committers, so that we can tell how homo-
or heterogeneous that community is at the moment?
Yoav
On 6/20/06, Sakala, Adinarayana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Below is a project proposal
Hi Yoav,
Please take a look at the Homogeneous Developers section of the proposal,
essentially the project consists of committers from Envoi Solutions, IONA
Technologies, LogicBlaze, BEA, Red Hat and some individual contributors not
funded by any particular employer. Also the proposal
Drummond,
I welcome the frank assessment and talk on the issues. No, there is no
intent to penalize anyone :) We already have projects that implement
OASIS standards but are *very * careful about keeping our ears and
eyes open for potential problems. I am glad to have you guys here and
to hear
Ah Nice! thanks for the good news!
-- dims
On 6/20/06, Peter Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/20/2006 12:55 PM, Drummond Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dims,
I am very familiar with the SAML and OpenSAML problems; on this message I'm
cc'ing Peter Davis of NeuStar who has been helping to
On Jun 20, 2006, at 5:54 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
This has obviously been something we've been looking at in order to do
our own due diligence on XRI IPR before being willing to contribute
the
Yadis spec to be incorporated into XRI Resolution 2.0.
That's great, but I wasn't just
Roy,
I have verbal commitment from all of the contributors to sign the CCLA,
though I will make sure to email everyone stressing this point again
later this evening.
--David
-Original Message-
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:41 PM
To:
Since there is no heavy no no! don't use the MyFaces contnuum zone;
I'll bring this issue up to myfaces-dev list.
Regards,
Matthias
On 6/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would be another possibility.
but any objections when using the MyFaces continuum for ADF / Trinidad ?
On Jun 20, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
On Jun 19, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Jim Hurley wrote:
This proposal seeks to create a project within the Apache Software
Foundation to continue the development and advancement of Jini
technology. It has broad backing from the Jini Community, and
Going to hop on that list and help you out over there.
On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Since there is no heavy no no! don't use the MyFaces contnuum zone;
I'll bring this issue up to myfaces-dev list.
Regards,
Matthias
On 6/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it runs like a charme ;-)
Continuum is great!
-Matthias
On 6/20/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Going to hop on that list and help you out over there.
On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Since there is no heavy no no! don't use the MyFaces contnuum zone;
Roy and others at Apache,
There are a few OASIS TCs that meet the requirements of Apache and
other FOSS projects with respect to implementability without fear of
royalty burden or patent reprisal. The ability to do stipulate such
provisions was hard-fought at OASIS (first by Sun and later
+1 (as in will help).
From the text below and the comments in
http://archives.java.sun.com/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0604L=jini-usersF=S=P=4029,
I assume that the scope of the project will just be the core
infrastructure. But you also mention related utilities and tools.
Can you clarify a little more
21 matches
Mail list logo
