Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 8/26/06, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From an application perspective, we have great hopes for a cooperation
with the Lucene project.
Great, I think this is something I'd like to get involved in!
I've been thinking about how Solr integration could work.
You
On 8/25/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos. So, there's no
requirement that you provide a reason for voting against it - just
like you don't have to provide a reason why you're voting
On 8/27/06, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it would be a lot easier if one had special support for
embedded structures in the index -- like you need for XML indexing.
Lucene doesn't have embedded structures yet, but it's been discussed.
Hi,
It looks like people objected to creating another mailing list for
policy so I just used [policy] as Robert did in a previous message.
Henri has setup Maven repositories for the incubator and there is a
document which is an attempt to describe the current setup here:
On 8/26/06, david reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I suggest something like
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/doap-converter
Is this really the right place? How do the files get from this set of
directories to site-publish?
i'm not sure
I updated the page and updated the site. Waiting for the sync.
Craig
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:29 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 8/26/06, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After the reorganization of the incubator site, the main page has
at least
three broken links:
pThere is a
Hi,
On 8/27/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was discussion that incubator repository would not be sync'd to
the central repository but I don't really see much point in this.
[...]
Also someone may make an repository request to place an incubator
artifact in the central
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 8/27/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was discussion that incubator repository would not be sync'd to
the central repository but I don't really see much point in this.
[...]
Also someone may make an repository request
The company behind Kabuki decided to stop (from their side) the
incubation process at the ASF - you should go and contact them
directly.
regards,
Martin
On 8/26/06, david reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was browsing incubator today and found:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 8/11/06, Steve Toback [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Lokahi community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
Lokahi M01. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy
we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
publish
On 27 Aug 06, at 6:28 PM 27 Aug 06, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On 8/27/06, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was discussion that incubator repository would not be
sync'd to
the central repository but I don't really see much
On Monday 28 August 2006 08:58, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Perhaps Maven can help by not allowing the transitive dependency on
incubating projects? Just thinking out loud...
If you can clearly see what you have in a report so I'm not sure we
would want to put any special rules in place to
On 27 Aug 06, at 10:26 PM 27 Aug 06, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 28 August 2006 08:58, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Perhaps Maven can help by not allowing the transitive dependency on
incubating projects? Just thinking out loud...
If you can clearly see what you have in a report so I'm not sure
On Monday 28 August 2006 11:31, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Could that report be made part of the release:prepare and the
release manager
had to explicitly approve it??
How are we supposed to enforce that? And what if they are not using
Maven? Say using either the Maven Ant Tasks, or Ivy, or
14 matches
Mail list logo
