To fix the issue that robert spotted I will remove the offending
(unused) file from svn and the distro. Do I then need to ask the tuscany
committers for another vote on this release?
Cheers,
On 23/04/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/04/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have now removed the xhtml schema from svn and from the sdo
source distribution zip/tar.gz and refreshed the md5/asc files here:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/
Cheers,
On 24/04/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To fix the issue that robert spotted I will remove the
this has been completed.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/perl/Apache-Reload/
--Geoff
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
I've started the absorption process for Apache::Reload, a simple Perl
module on CPAN that the author would like us (the mod_perl folks) to
take over.
relevant
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened here ?
Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a
new event (was announced on
February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous
times on general.
Robert, thanks for that. Can I just clarify something please. I may be
mistaken but I thought I had understood that the incubator repo is not
mirrored anywhere. If this is true one could interpret from your response
that publishing artifacts that have not yet been approved to the incubator
kelvin goodson wrote:
Robert, thanks for that. Can I just clarify something please. I may be
mistaken but I thought I had understood that the incubator repo is not
mirrored anywhere. If this is true one could interpret from your response
that publishing artifacts that have not yet been
Upayavira,
OK, thanks for the clarification.
Kelvin.
On 24/04/07, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kelvin goodson wrote:
Robert, thanks for that. Can I just clarify something please. I may be
mistaken but I thought I had understood that the incubator repo is not
mirrored anywhere. If
I'm looking to complete the last open item on OpenJPA's incubation
requirements, which is the trademark search. I've seen several
unresponded messages over the past two years that no one can seem to
find the free search button on nameprotect.com. I have to conclude
that there is no free
Hi Craig,
see here
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-27
I did it for Trinidad like you did now. US Patent and google search.
-Matthias
On 4/24/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking to complete the last open item on OpenJPA's incubation
requirements, which is
Hi Matthias,
Did you ever ping legal-discuss, as mentioned in the JIRA issue?
Thanks,
Craig
On Apr 24, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi Craig,
see here
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-27
I did it for Trinidad like you did now. US Patent and google search.
Brett,
What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at
no charge to the public.
A bit generic for a project that is intended to managing an
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett,
What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
There are individuals from = 3 employers in both committers and the PMC.
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
enterprise application and
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release
of OpenJPA.
The vote email thread is available here:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---THIRD-ATTEMPT--publish-openjpa-0.9.7-incubating-release-tf3620224.htmlhttp://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/msg15640.html
In summary we have 6
Dion Gillard wrote:
On 4/24/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened here ?
Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a
new event (was announced on
February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous
times on general.
I don't
Hi folks,
Can someone help me find the answer to the following questions that I
posted:
Speaking of which, where is the official place to upload the
release artifact to and what is the official mailing list to
make the announcement? Is there an ASF document I can read
to learn all about
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at
no charge to the public.
A bit generic for a project
On Sunday 22 April 2007 20:44, George Aroush wrote:
Speaking of which, where is the office place to upload the release artifact
to and what is the official mailing list to make the announcement? Is
there an ASF document I can read to learn all about this?
Check
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 08:31, David Blevins wrote:
Generally, I think it's good to use words that describe EJB then the
words Enterprise JavaBeans specifically. Primarily because I think
it's good to be able to innovate in the space and not limit ourselves
to the ideas approved by the
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 00:09, Craig L Russell wrote:
I've also looked at the first 180 Google results for OpenJPA and none
of them are about any topic other than our own Apache project. Sadly,
there are approximately 101,000 hits and I just don't have time to
look at all of them.
With
* OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project
Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved.
The All rights reserved. means that it has not been
properly licensed, and I as the licensee of OpenJPA will have
no rights to it either.
Clarification, please.
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote:
* OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project
Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved.
The All rights reserved. means that it has not been
properly licensed, and I as the licensee of OpenJPA
+1 looks good to me.
It might be worth running RAT against the release next time to double
check that all the license headers are properly applied etc.
On 4/24/07, Michael Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release
of OpenJPA.
The vote email
On Apr 24, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 08:31, David Blevins wrote:
Generally, I think it's good to use words that describe EJB then the
words Enterprise JavaBeans specifically. Primarily because I think
it's good to be able to innovate in the space and
FWIW, I think that RAT was run at some point during the process.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc.,
24 matches
Mail list logo
