Brett Porter wrote:
Noel J. Bergman asked:
What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
There are individuals from = 3 employers in both committers and the PMC.
Is that still true of companies owned by the same entity are counted as one
(e.g., IBM, Lotus and Tivoli would count as
David Blevins wrote:
We could use Scalable, transactional, and multi-user
secure architecture for the development and deployment
of component-based business applications
How would that differ from River or WS (various WS-* specs cover
transactions and security)?
Generally, I think it's good
David Blevins wrote:
The definition of ejb spells out Scalable, transactional, and
multi-user secure which is summed up by the word 'enterprise'.
So maybe something like creation and maintenance of enterprise
application containers and object distribution. Maybe expand
that last part to
On 30/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that still true of companies owned by the same entity are counted as one
(e.g., IBM, Lotus and Tivoli would count as a single employer)?
Yup.
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe,
On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote:
* OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project
Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved.
The All rights reserved. means that it has not been
properly
On 4/30/07, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote:
* OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project
Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved.
The All
The OpenJPA project is pleased to announce its 0.9.-7 incubating release.
This release contains bug fixes and new features.
The release can be downloaded from the project web site at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/openjpa/Downloads.
More information can be found in the
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
We could use Scalable, transactional, and multi-user
secure architecture for the development and deployment
of component-based business applications
How would that differ from River or WS (various WS-* specs cover
transactions and security)?
They
David Blevins wrote:
Couldn't that be in EJB and related technologies ??
Certainly implementing the EJB spec is a constant for the project, so
that description would be adequate. It does give me an ick feeling
though as it's very much in the nature of the project to go beyond EJB
and test
On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Couldn't that be in EJB and related technologies ??
Certainly implementing the EJB spec is a constant for the project,
so that description would be adequate. It does give me an ick
feeling though as it's very
10 matches
Mail list logo
