[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CXF Graduation as TLP

2008-03-21 Thread Daniel Kulp
Wow. Hard to tally. Lots of votes. :-) (Also,the list at http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html seems slightly out of date. I know gnodet and bsnyder are binding, but they aren't on the list.) 13 +1 IPMC binding: bsnyder, dims, rbdonkin, jstrachan, mdashorst, crussel, kevan, pfreman

Re: [VOTE] Apache Qpid Graduation as TLP

2008-03-21 Thread Matthieu Riou
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. > [X] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > You never know if you're ready before really trying :) But from what I've seen they're close enough. They seem to mostly know what they

Re: [VOTE] Apache Qpid Graduation as TLP

2008-03-21 Thread Yoav Shapira
I guess I should vote on the official thread ;) On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. > [ X ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Yoav - To unsubsc

Re: Statements from Qpid mentors would help me decide... [WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache Qpid Graduation as TLP]

2008-03-21 Thread Davanum Srinivas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I agree with Robert, I'd prefer to wait a bit to see the community grow. Yes, it's a subjective call. No, not enough for a -1So my vote would be a -0. thanks, dims Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: | On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Carl Trieloff <[

Re: Statements from Qpid mentors would help me decide... [WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache Qpid Graduation as TLP]

2008-03-21 Thread Carl Trieloff
I am not going to argue this either way, as this is mostly subjective. I will point out that Qpid does have a steady stream of people that are not associated with any of the existing committiers including some new folks starting to provide patches as recently as last week. This would indicate

Re: Statements from Qpid mentors would help me decide... [WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache Qpid Graduation as TLP]

2008-03-21 Thread Paul Fremantle
Yoav I have to say I think you have given a very good analysis. I think that QPid has come a huge way towards Apacheness. Diversity is not as great as it could be but meets the Incubator criteria. I support the QPid graduation because I think that QPid is doing the right things in the right way, a

RE: Statements from Qpid mentors would help me decide... [WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache Qpid Graduation as TLP]

2008-03-21 Thread Scott Deboy
I would expect to see proof of qpid's ability to grow their committership and build a user community before leaving the incubator. There's no track record of either at the moment. According to incubator-general mail archives, qpid voted in 4 committers since April of 2007. Additionally, those

Re: Statements from Qpid mentors would help me decide... [WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache Qpid Graduation as TLP]

2008-03-21 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At this point the Apache Qpid community with support from its mentors > feels that > > it is ready to graduate to an official top le

Statements from Qpid mentors would help me decide... [WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache Qpid Graduation as TLP]

2008-03-21 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Qpid entered into the incubator November 2006, and has made releases, is > in the > process of closing down another minor release and well on the way to the > next > major release, added new committers, and cleaned u