+1
Paul
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> > The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
> > SCA 1.2-incubating. The vote thread is here ...
>
On 4/23/08, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> > i've committed a stripped down template and moved the prose into a
> > guide. this guide is just copy ATM
>
> With all due and sincere respect to Roy, the current IP Clearance form was
> done in conjunction
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Firstly, I'm +1 on this release. I have a few minor
comments/suggestions which you may want to consider for the next
release (or not!)
1) Theres a parent pom for apache which if you make the parent of the
uimaj pom means you don't have to duplicate the license a
In case it wasn't clear, the incubator/openjpa web site already
redirects to the live site.
There's no need to preserve it. It's obsolete.
Craig
On Apr 22, 2008, at 9:32 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
With 587 MB, OpenJPA wins and is still champion. ;-)
It's ok to redirect the incubator site t
With 587 MB, OpenJPA wins and is still champion. ;-)
It's ok to redirect the incubator site to openjpa.apache.org.
Craig
On Apr 22, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Good day,
As part of rolling out th
Firstly, I'm +1 on this release. I have a few minor
comments/suggestions which you may want to consider for the next
release (or not!)
1) Theres a parent pom for apache which if you make the parent of the
uimaj pom means you don't have to duplicate the license and
organization details in your poms
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> i've committed a stripped down template and moved the prose into a
> guide. this guide is just copy ATM
With all due and sincere respect to Roy, the current IP Clearance form was
done in conjunction with the Board. Over the past several years it has been
modified s
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Justin
> >
> > Is the prefereed method of handling these, moving them to
> archive.a.o/incubator.a.o/($podling)/ ?? Or is there an al
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:55 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> > I've wasted too much time today on the stupid IP Clearance template
> > that insists on asking a bunch of irrelevant questions about
> > decisions that the Incubator is not responsible fo
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin
>
> Is the prefereed method of handling these, moving them to
> archive.a.o/incubator.a.o/($podling)/ ?? Or is there an alternate location?
If the projects have indeed graduated, and they already have
$podling.a
Justin
Is the prefereed method of handling these, moving them to
archive.a.o/incubator.a.o/($podling)/ ?? Or is there an alternate location?
Tony
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:59:05
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on this, I would like to keep things as they are, unless there is a
> new conclusion about where things like documentation should go.
Nah - that's fine. The issue is the TLPs that have graduated and left
a bunch
Tony Stevenson wrote:
Good day,
As part of rolling out the new backup server for the infra team, I
have discovered that several podling sites are extremely large.
Namely:
...
166M/x1/www/incubator.apache.org/uima
I checked into this and discovered that > 85% of the space is due to our
k
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good day,
>
> As part of rolling out the new backup server for the infra team, I have
> discovered that several podling sites are extremely large.
>
> Namely:
>
> 119M/x1/www/incubator.apache.org/activemq
graduated
Good day,
As part of rolling out the new backup server for the infra team, I have
discovered that several podling sites are extremely large.
Namely:
119M/x1/www/incubator.apache.org/activemq
324M/x1/www/incubator.apache.org/cxf
102M/x1/www/incubator.apache.org/directory
166M/x
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
> SCA 1.2-incubating. The vote thread is here ...
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg30405.html
>
> The artifacts are ava
+1
...ant
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
> SCA 1.2-incubating. The vote thread is here ...
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg30405.html
>
> The ar
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 21 April 2008 17:46, Paul Fremantle wrote:
the mentors to be the
"primary contacts" for any podling.
+1. With 3 active mentors, you practically need no other PMC members to wake
up (let me sleep ;o) ). If you don't have 3 active mentors, then that IS a
problem
18 matches
Mail list logo
