On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Apache Pig dev community voted to release Pig 0.1.0-incubating. We had 4
> +1 votes from committers and mentors and no 0 or -1 votes. (Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> .
>
> The artifacts are availabl
as a scientist, i am getting somewhat bristly at all the rumor,
innuendo, and hyperbole around names. i've not seen any definitive or
measurable steps that can be take to ensure success. we're also ignoring
the silent majority which seems to like etch just fine. my personal
opinion is that the
+1 Well said.
Part of the silent majority,
Craig
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:29 AM, scott comer wrote:
as a scientist, i am getting somewhat bristly at all the rumor,
innuendo, and hyperbole around names. i've not seen any definitive
or measurable steps that can be take to ensure success. we're
+1 to Scott's comments.
I don't think the name is a significant conflict at all. Debian Etch is a
release codename - regular references to it will fade away as the next
release surfaces, and the Apache Etch name, if it is a successful project,
should last much longer. This would supplant recogn
Scott Comer wrote:
> as a scientist, i am getting somewhat bristly at all the rumor,
> innuendo, and hyperbole around names.
Can you be more specific?
So far the best argument against Etch that I've seen is Grant's, and Les
makes a good point about the transient nature of such release labels.
>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:29 PM, scott comer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as a scientist, i am getting somewhat bristly at all the rumor, innuendo,
> and hyperbole around names. i've not seen any definitive or measurable steps
> that can be take to ensure success. we're also ignoring the silent maj
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Scott Comer wrote:
the important thing right now is, i think, that searching now for etch
doesn't not reveal anything which is obviously competing technology
True, but were the debian community to make "a federal case" of the issue, I
don't know that the name would be
Hi,
Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pig 0.1.0-incubating
>
> On Mon, Aug
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
>> To: general@incubator.ap
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Scott Comer wrote:
>>> the important thing right now is, i think, that searching now for etch
>>> doesn't not reveal anything which is obviously competing technology
>> True, but were the debian community to make "a federal case" of the issue
Replies inline.
...ant
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:0
11 matches
Mail list logo
