Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-06 Thread Ralph Goers
On Sep 5, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: Voting against a bunch of people forming a new community here at the ASF is v.disappointing and goes against what IMO the ASF is all about. If the Felix community wants to get involved with their efforts then great, if not then don't try

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-06 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Ralph, Not yet. Let's wait for the discussions to wrap up. thanks, dims On 09/06/2009 02:59 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Sep 5, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: Voting against a bunch of people forming a new community here at the ASF is v.disappointing and goes against what IMO

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-06 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Richard, I did agree with you that Felix would make a great choice as a destination TLP. The situation with ServiceMix/Karaf is not the same as what is happening here with a new set of incoming committers and code. I sincerely do hope that cross-pollination happens even when the podling is in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-06 Thread Marcel Offermans
It probably got swamped in the discussion, but, on Sep 1, 2009, at 22:20 , Marcel Offermans wrote: On Sep 1, 2009, at 16:38 , Jeremy Hughes wrote: Relationships with Other Apache Projects I know ACE is only in incubation, but is there a reason for not mentioning it in this list? To me

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-06 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Stuart, Thanks a ton. Please do join the aries mailing list(s) after we VOTE on (and hopefully accept) the proposal. All the action will shift there from this mailing list. thanks, dims On 09/05/2009 11:08 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: 2009/9/5 Davanum Srinivasdava...@gmail.com One more

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-06 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Marcel, I believe it was an oversight to have missed mentioning ACE. Hopefully one of the proposed committers will comment on this aspect. thanks, dims On 09/06/2009 08:29 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote: It probably got swamped in the discussion, but, on Sep 1, 2009, at 22:20 , Marcel Offermans

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-06 Thread Graham Charters
Hi Marcel, Not mentioning ACE was an oversight. I think there are two potential roles for ACE in relation Aries: 1. To distribute and configure the runtime components (those implementing the enterprise OSGi application programming model). 2. To distribute and configure enterprise OSGi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Aries incubator for Enterprise OSGi

2009-09-06 Thread Marcel Offermans
Hello Graham, ACE only just started, so no problem! :) I'm looking forward to working with Aries on making this happen. I agree with your analysis so far. Greetings, Marcel On Sep 6, 2009, at 22:32 , Graham Charters wrote: Hi Marcel, Not mentioning ACE was an oversight. I think there