Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

2009/11/23 Reinhard Pötz > > > > > [ ] +1, bring Clerezza into Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way, > > [ ] -1, do not bring Clerezza into Incubator, because... > > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and only votes from the Incubator > > PMC are binding. > > +1 Tommaso

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache > Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and > as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal > . We ask

AUTO: Greg Truty/Austin/IBM is out of the office until 07/30/2001. (returning 11/30/2009)

I am out of the office until 11/30/2009. Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator" sent on 11/23/09 13:21:17. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

+1 2009/11/23 adam wojtuniak : >  [X] +1, bring Clerezza into Incubator  (non binding) > > Cheers, > Adam > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür < > reto.bachm...@trialox.org> wrote: > >> Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache >> Incubator. The full

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache > Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and > as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

+1 regards, Karl On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > +1 > > Sounds like a very interesting project. > > Craig > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > >> Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache >> Incubator. The full propo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

+1 Sounds like a very interesting project. Craig On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/i

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

[X] +1, bring Clerezza into Incubator (non binding) Cheers, Adam On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür < reto.bachm...@trialox.org> wrote: > Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache > Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this messag

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

+1 Regards, Alan On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > ...The full proposal is available at the end of this message and > as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal > The first link is the right one, of course. > .

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

+1 (non binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm not on the general incubator list but have followed the discussion for this thread via the online archives. There are two things I'd like to point out. I created the archive in .bz2 format because that is what was suggested in the last paragrap

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

+1, bring Clerezza into Incubator On 11/23/2009 01:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal <

[VOTE] release cassandra 0.5.0-beta1

The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.5.0-beta1. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, structured key-value store. Podling vote thread: http

[VOTE] Accept Apache Clerezza into the incubator

Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal . We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it,

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

sebb wrote: > Not relevant - the discussion is about what archives are supported by > the OS, not the development process. > I thought it was about which archive formats an ASF release should be distributed in. All I ever recall reading in policy documents are requirements about the /contents/

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: > There is only a "bz2" arch

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote: On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: There is only a "bz2" archive. Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are more common

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> >>> There is only a "bz2" archive. >>> Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are >>> more commonly supported. >>> >>> IMO, this

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

The only thing that should block a release is a policy violation, either of the IPMC or the ASF. This doesn't appear to be the case. Sebb, I'd like to suggest you join the IPMC so you can issue binding +/- 1's instead of overall vetoes (which carry no weight unless it pertains to policy).

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On 23/11/2009, Branko Čibej wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> There is only a "bz2" archive. > >>> Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are > >>> more common

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

sebb wrote: > On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> >> >>> There is only a "bz2" archive. >>> Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are >>> more commonly supported. >>> >>> IMO, this is a release blocker >>>

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > There is only a "bz2" archive. > > Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are > > more commonly supported. > > > > IMO, this is a release blocker > > > > Just curious why you th

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

I ran a RAT report on the release and all looks good. Has the appropriate license/notice/disclaimer files. From what I can see only the project source is shipped, so although there are some dependencies that wouldn't be allowed under ASF policy, since they're not shipped with the release then this

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote: There is only a "bz2" archive. Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are more commonly supported. IMO, this is a release blocker Just curious why you think this is a blocker? Each project knows better what formats are co

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

On 18/11/2009, Josh Thompson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Incubator PMC, > > The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache > VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to > publish this release. > > Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Incubator Shindig version 1.1-BETA5

+1. Upayavira On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 12:21 -0800, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > +1 Sorry for being late. > > -h > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 13:00, Paul Lindner wrote: > > The Shindig community voted on and approved the release of Apache Shiindig > > 1.1-BETA5. We would now like to reque

Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

All, Would appreciate some reviews and votes for this release. It's the first Incubator release for VCL and could definitely benefit from some extra eyes. Thanks! --kevan On Nov 18, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Josh Thompson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Incubator PMC, >