I dare say I would probably be interested in most anything you can come up
with :) but I suspect the project would need to be something more specific
as a starter for the incubator?
Could throw out a few ideas maybe, see what people can come up with? Is
this mailing list the right place for that
On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Christopher Brind wrote:
I dare say I would probably be interested in most anything you can come up
with :) but I suspect the project would need to be something more specific
as a starter for the incubator?
+1 to that.
What sets android apart from its peers to make
On 16 Feb 2010, at 10:05, Nick Kew wrote:
On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Christopher Brind wrote:
I dare say I would probably be interested in most anything you can
come up
with :) but I suspect the project would need to be something more
specific
as a starter for the incubator?
+1 to
On 15/Feb/2010 20:56, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Would there be interest in a project to develop Android-based apps?
know that it sounds like an umbrella, and perhaps it would be until we
developed some critical mass, but it would provide us with a place to
collaborate.
For those people who are
+1 (mentor and IPMC binding)
Some thoughts, but nothing that I would consider a show stopper since this
is a source only release (aka: not providing a prebuilt war type thing or
deploying it to Maven central):
1) The README mentions a Collective work: Copyright 2007, but the NOTICE
starts
Howdy,
I seem to clearly recall that I sent a message a while ago stating
that I didn't have quite enough time to follow River with the
attention it deserves. It seems that one fell through some cracks
(most likely sitting in one of my draft folders) and I was reminded
that indeed I am still
Thanks for volunteering in the first place...
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Gianugo Rabellino gian...@apache.org wrote:
Howdy,
I seem to clearly recall that I sent a message a while ago stating
that I didn't have quite enough time to follow River with the
attention it deserves. It seems
-- Forwarded message --
From: Richard Hirsch hirsch.d...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0
To: Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue February 16 2010 10:18:10 am Richard Hirsch wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
2) The tar unpacks into a trunk directory. That really should unpack
into
a apache-esme-1.0 directory or similar.
I'll change this for the next release.
3)
Hi guys,
On 2/16/10 8:22 AM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
What would be better in the pom.xml:
versionapache-esme-1.0/version?
No, just 1.0-incubator or similar. If this is the 1.0 release, the version
number should be 1.0. The 1.1 release would have a version of 1.1.
According
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Richard Hirsch hirsch.d...@gmail.com wrote:
...The candidate can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/
Unfortunately I'm -1 on the release, I have a few issues including a
GPL dependency.
1) jwebunit dependency is GPL
The server module
- Original Message
From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
To: esme-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 11:28:22 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at
Lee Fisher wrote:
What would be the focus (if any)?
Two areas of emphasis that I'd think useful:
1) NDK-based: or APR, httpd, and other appropriate *-c projects, for
unblocked devices and other Android-based platforms.
Ensure BIONC C comapatility, address Binder/AIDL/JNI lib issues, so
Thanks for voting, everybody! There was a slew of +1 votes, and no -1 votes.
The svn devs also had a quick discussion for the VP recommendation to
the Board, starting with my self-nomination. There were a couple other
people that may be interested in future years, but there was general
support
Like I said - I'm seeing this first release as a learning experience (grin,
grin)
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Richard Hirsch hirsch.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
...The candidate can be found at:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
...Unfortunately I'm -1 on the release, I have a few issues including a
GPL dependency.
1) jwebunit dependency is GPL
The server module
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
The svn devs also had a quick discussion for the VP recommendation to
the Board, starting with my self-nomination. There were a couple other
people that may be interested in future years, but there was general
support for my
Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and call
a vote.
I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the
necessary bits in place for the proposal to go forward. note. Both Patrick
Chris are
Hi Ian,
Thanks!
I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the
necessary bits in place for the proposal to go forward. note. Both Patrick
Chris are comitters in the lucene/hadoop projects.
To clarify:
Patrick is a
Thanks Ian !
completely biased ;-)
[x] +1. Accept SIS into the Incubator.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Ian Holsman li...@holsman.net wrote:
Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and
call a vote.
I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ian Holsman li...@holsman.net wrote:
I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
Information Systems (SIS).
Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SpatialProposal
[x] +1. Accept SIS into the Incubator.
--
Niclas Hedhman,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Ian Holsman li...@holsman.net wrote:
I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the
necessary bits in place for the proposal to go forward. note. Both Patrick
Chris are comitters in the
22 matches
Mail list logo
