Please vote on releasing the following as
Apache Jena version 2.7.0-incubating
This will be the first incubator release for Jena at Apache.
== Overview
Jena is a Java framework for building Semantic Web applications. Jena
provides a collection of tools and Java libraries to help to develop
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
--tim
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Marcel Offermans
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:
Hello all,
As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is
time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on
recommending this resolution [2] to the
+1
Dan
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:55:46 PM Marcel Offermans wrote:
Hello all,
As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it
is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on
recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF board.
It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call
a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache
Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included
below for your convenience.
Please vote:
[ ] +1 Accept Bloodhound for incubation
Hi everyone,
I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
Here's a link to the proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
Thank you,
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Hoo hoo!! Look at that committer list!
Great stuff. Happy to see this finally land. Big +1!
On Dec 19, 2011 3:21 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
Here's a link to the proposal:
A minor comment on one sentence...
To that end, Adobe will only have minority representation on the
initial committers list.
As I understand it, companies don't have representation in Apache
projects. Individuals do, that may or may not belong to a given
company, and that may or may not be
Hello Alex,
On Dec 19, 2011, at 21:20 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
I would like to propose Flex to be an Apache Incubator project.
Here's a link to the proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FlexProposal
First of all, thanks for this proposal, it looks well thought out. I have a
question
Donald Whitlock wrote : Looks interesting, though. Given AOO, is this
suggesting a trend of
major companies transferring code and communities to Apache?
Community support and development is a principal strength of open source
development. And it is increasingly apparent, at least to us, that
I don't read it that way. Yes, ASF projects only contain individuals, but
most of those individuals are employed and are in some way influenced by
their employer. Calling out that the initial set of committers will be
diverse and that a majority of those committers will be coming from places
Agreed. That is/was my read, too.
On Dec 19, 2011 6:48 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
I don't read it that way. Yes, ASF projects only contain individuals, but
most of those individuals are employed and are in some way influenced by
their employer. Calling
On Dec 19, 2011 1:55 PM, Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
It seems discussion on Bloodhound has died down, so it's time to call
a VOTE. Please vote on the acceptance of Bloodhound into the Apache
Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included
Thank you for point it out.
Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt.
But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit dependence
in LICENSE files.
As our test code locate in the Apache SVN, it should also be a part of our
artifacts.
I also see Apache
On 20 December 2011 02:30, Devin Han devin...@apache.org wrote:
Thank you for point it out.
Just as your comments, I agree to remove JUnit info from NOTICE.txt.
But it should be reasonable to keep the statement that we JUnit dependence
in LICENSE files.
No, not if it is not included in the
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE
We do ship the junit jar in some of our release artifacts though, which is
why it's there
(It's also worth pointing out that
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. That is/was my read, too.
Even still, companies don't participate in ASF projects, individuals
do. To me, the proposal implies Adobe is a participating entity. The
sentence in question would read better as To that end,
Thank you for the explanation. OK I will remove JUnit info from LN.
2011/12/20 Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
I also see Apache POI keeping JUnit statement in their LICENSE file:
My responses inline.
On 12/19/11 3:39 PM, Raju Bitter rajubit...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
the proposal looks very promising. I have a few questions around
ActionScript, runtime environments for compiled code, HTML5/JavaScript
cross-compilation support, and target runtime
19 matches
Mail list logo
