+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://wwx.talend.com
- Reply message -
From: "Mark Struberg"
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Clarify the role of the Champion as an "incubation coordinator"
Date: F
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 7:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Clarify the role of the Champion as an "incubation
> coordinator"
>
> +1 (binding).
>
>
+1
In the docs, please remind to keep site-author/podlings.xml@champion up-to-date.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> The ASF is not about code; it is about community. If a community forks,
> or otherwise emerges around a codebase, we are not accepting the CODE: we
> are accepting the COMMUNITY.
>
>> On
On 01/12/2012 09:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
the goal is to try and improve the PMC's oversight on podling reports
and missing mentors, by having the Champion act as the main liaison
between a podling and
+1 (binding).
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 12, 2012, at 7:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
> the goal is to try and improve the PMC's oversight on podling reports
> and missing mentors, by having the Champion a
+1
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> +1
>
> here is then some update needed too (i think):
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > Hi Incubator PMC,
> >
> > Here's the re
+1
here is then some update needed too (i think):
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
> the goal is to try and impr
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
> the goal is to try and improve the PMC's oversight on podling reports
> and missing mentors, by having the Champion act as the main liaison
> be
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 01/08/2012 06:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>>> 2008-10-09 Droids
>>
>> S: Somewhat active, still not enough for a TLP. Last report mentions
>> IP clearance issues?
>> R: Ask for a graduation plan in next report.
>
> I'm a mentor this
On 01/08/2012 06:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
2008-10-09 Droids
S: Somewhat active, still not enough for a TLP. Last report mentions
IP clearance issues?
R: Ask for a graduation plan in next report.
I'm a mentor this project and will get things moving.
You say it isn't active enough for a T
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:13 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>>
>>> We've repeatedly asked projects to focus on their graduation requirements.
>>> What can we do to help push them in the right di
+1
Makes perfect sense to me!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I'm +1 on this too. I think its the easiest way to get close to what
Niclas was just suggesting of having only a single responsible mentor
but avoids all the debates about changing the number mentors.
...ant
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> +1
>
> (thanks for bringing th
+1
(thanks for bringing this together Bertrand)
On 12 January 2012 15:02, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
> the goal is to try and improve the PMC's oversight on podling reports
> and missing mentors, by havin
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> I'll start working on closing things down shortly.
The retirement process as described in [1] is now complete.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
Hi Incubator PMC,
Here's the result of discussions that took place around Christmas -
the goal is to try and improve the PMC's oversight on podling reports
and missing mentors, by having the Champion act as the main liaison
between a podling and the Incubator PMC.
If we agree on the below princip
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Now lets look at the remainder- several projects with no report whatsoever
>
> This has been an issue. Perhaps we need to put some teeth in the
> requirement, such as closing down commit access until reports are posted? I
> don't have a
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:00:41 PM Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> I contacted stonehenge-dev@, asking them to retire or come up with a
>> plan to revive the project. No mentors visible (6 listed).
>
> We already had the vote to retire it:
>
On Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:00:41 PM Jukka Zitting wrote:
> The status of Kato (in relation to Oracle's actions) is being
> evaluated. Ant is helping the community.
>
> >> 2008-11-19 Stonehenge
> >
> > S: Zero activity.
> > R: Terminate.
>
> I contacted stonehenge-dev@, asking them to retire
We still need to get one more IPMC vote to close this vote. If someone could
take a look, it would be greatly appreciated.
-Matt
>-Original Message-
>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:03 AM
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Sub
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>>> Let's stop discussing this issue in the abstract
>>
>> Good idea. Lets be more specific, and put together something actionable.
>>
>>> Now lets look at the re
Hi,
Following up on projects where my recommendation was an unconditional
"Terminate".
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> 2008-08-19 PhotArk
>
> S: Zero recent activity.
> R: Terminate.
I contacted photark-dev@, asking for
+1 for Sam's suggested actions below.
Ross
On 12 January 2012 13:30, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>>> Let's stop discussing this issue in the abstract
>>
>> Good idea. Lets be more specific, and put together something acti
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
>> Let's stop discussing this issue in the abstract
>
> Good idea. Lets be more specific, and put together something actionable.
>
>> Now lets look at the remainder- several projects with no report whatsoever
>
> Thi
1 responsible mentor doesn't exclude 3 or more IPMC members helping
out, but if everyone is supposed to do it, it will happen that no one
feel enough obligated to do so. Why do we have a PMC Chair? Why not 3?
There is purpose of elevated responsibility, it works outside ASF and
I am confident it wi
On 12 January 2012 12:35, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26:49PM +, sebb wrote:
>> On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
>> >> > How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
>> >> >
On Jan 12, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> I was thinking about this differently: mentors be responsible for
>> ensuring IPMC has a complete picture, but normally the PPMC members
>> write the reports. (Not unlike how, in a P
On Jan 11, 2012, at 10:44 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/11/2012 11:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 00:33, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> Joe Schaefer wrote:
Now lets look at the remainder- several projects with no report whatsoever
>>>
>>> This has been an issue.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26:49PM +, sebb wrote:
> On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
> >> > How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
> >> > manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
>> > How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
>> > manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
>> > better/easier?
>>
>> I checkout the SVN tag and explode
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
> > How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
> > manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
> > better/easier?
>
> I checkout the SVN tag and explode the archive(s) in the same parent
> directory, and then
Please trim your quotes when replying, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 11 January 2012 18:44, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb wrote:
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>> In this case the files are exactly the same, th
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:27 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 January 2012 06:09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Cordova
>
> Does not appear to mention anywhere that the previous name was
> Callback which is a strange omission.
The renaming was mentioned already in the December report.
Anyway, for clar
On 12 January 2012 06:09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> A number of substantive issues came up during the past month.
>
> First, and although it was raised on the private list and therefore details
> won't be part of the public report, we advise the Board that there is
> substantial discussion regardin
I echo: congratulations!
I'm curious: are we--in this case, a more or less undefined subject of
the sentence--alerting any media organizations?
Louis
On 11 January 2012 23:22, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Yes, congratulations!
>
> On Jan 11, 2012, at 7:21 PM, Devin Han wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Ap
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> In this case the files are exactly the same, there is no difference
>> btw the contents of the two a
38 matches
Mail list logo
