On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take a deep
breath and allow room to digest and contemplate the various issues
that have led to a bumper crop of email. These are complex questions,
and even if
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 4, 2012 3:41 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Ross,
On Feb 3, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 4 February 2012 02:01, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
Hi folks!
I've quickly collected a page of things to check before casting your vote for a
staged release.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Reviewing+a+Release
This was done from the back of my head, thus I've maybe missed some parts. Just
wondered if we don't have such a
On 2/4/12 12:28 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 2/3/2012 9:01 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
Personally, I feel that walking in the door as a full PMC with authority
could be just as problematic in the long run as not granting it once the
community has demonstrated
On 2/4/12 1:11 AM, Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 23:17, Benson Margulies wrote:
A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take a deep
breath and allow room to digest and contemplate the various issues
that have led to a bumper crop of
On 4 February 2012 11:55, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
I've quickly collected a page of things to check before casting your vote for
a staged release.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Reviewing+a+Release
This was done from the back of my head,
I've added http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AlternativeIncubatorAnalysis
to the wiki, offering a more or less concrete alternative that is more
evolutionary and less revolutionary. Get out your darts, and feel free
to edit.
-
To
Great thanks! Could you add me to the initial committer list as well?
Colm.
2012/2/3 Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org:
Hi Colm,
this sounds great: I've just added your details to Syncope proposal [1]:
please check if everything is correct.
Regards.
Hi Ross,
On Feb 4, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 4, 2012 3:41 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
[...snip...]
Who fixes it?
The project's PMC. And if not, the project's VP. And
Benson,
I read your proposal.
This statement:
This leads to my first major qualm about Chris' proposal: everything good,
useful, or necessary about the existing PMC is dumped upon ComDev. There is, in
my mind, some circularity to the argument here. The incubator is a cesspit, so
we should
I am +1 to what your proposal does. I am not so fond of the wording of it.
I've tried to make changes to eliminate pointing fingers but just couldn't with
the last section. I would suggest you take another stab at editing it to: a)
make this proposal a general document, not just from you, and
Chris,
I read your proposal, and I read as lot of other email, and it appears
that the results in my head were a bit of a salad. After re-reading
your proposal, I will make some mods in a moment and remove that
remark in particular.
--benson
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Ralph Goers
I see that Ralph already removed the worst of my excesses, and I fixed
a few others. Are we good?
I'm really not in this to win a fight ( -- or an election --) but
rather to help the community reach a consensus by stating a
(hopefully) clear alternative.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Benson
On Feb 4, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I see that Ralph already removed the worst of my excesses, and I fixed
a few others. Are we good?
I'm really not in this to win a fight ( -- or an election --) but
rather to help the community reach a consensus by stating a
(hopefully)
Ralph, I'm inclined to hair up the chart to distinguish 'podlings'
from 'probationary projects'. Otherwise, fine. I'll do that.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I see that Ralph already removed
Chris, seriously, take a break. You are not hearing what I'm trying to say
and therefore not answering my concerns, directly at least.
For an example see where you use the word failure in this reply - that word
has no bearing on anything I have said, yet you directly attribute it to
me.
I've
Hey Ross,
On Feb 4, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Chris, seriously, take a break. You are not hearing what I'm trying to say
and therefore not answering my concerns, directly at least.
I could say the same thing to you. :)
We both care about this stuff, which is why we keep
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 23:17, Benson Margulies wrote:
A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take a deep
breath and allow room to digest and contemplate the various issues
that have led to a bumper crop of email. These are complex
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 23:17, Benson Margulies wrote:
A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take a deep
breath and allow room to digest and contemplate the
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Ralph, I'm inclined to hair up the chart to distinguish 'podlings'
from 'probationary projects'. Otherwise, fine. I'll do that.
I see from your latest updates
On Feb 4, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 3 Feb 2012, at 23:17, Benson Margulies wrote:
A number of people are asking for the incubator PMC to take a
On 02/04/2012 09:15 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
We both care about this stuff, which is why we keep replying. I'm happy
to continue to reply, so long as you are when I feel it's warranted. I've
ignored a few of them that I didn't have the energy to, but that's the point
of a mailing
On 2/4/2012 2:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
[offlist]
(sorry, trying to respond individually to keep down the noise, stupid
trackpad+palm of my thumb sometimes lets notes fly prematurely. My bad.)
-
To unsubscribe,
On 2/4/2012 12:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
If it is different from Chris's then I think Bill should write his proposal.
Dave, mine is not difference in process, substance or requirements.
Chris and 7 board members are now familiar with the delta, which is
really not up for incubator to choose.
On 2/4/2012 3:05 AM, ant elder wrote:
I also agree with a comment from Sam on another thread about wouldn't
it be possible to get to just a single chair candidate. That doesn't
seem to be happening yet so as there are all these plans going on to
get rid of the Incubator altogether can't we
Hi Jakob,
I have to VOTE -1 on this release. The checksums check out, but your signature
is not present in the KEYS file, per below. If you add it to the KEYS file, I'd
be
happy to change my VOTE to a +1 should it pass verification:
[chipotle:~/tmp/giraph-0.1.0] mattmann% curl -O
On Feb 4, 2012, at 12:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/4/2012 12:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
If it is different from Chris's then I think Bill should write his proposal.
Dave, mine is not difference in process, substance or requirements.
Do you advocate the 3 Apache Members per
Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi folks!
I've quickly collected a page of things to check before casting your vote for
a staged release.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Reviewing+a+Release
This was done from the back of my head, thus I've maybe missed some parts.
Just
On Feb 4, 2012, at 2:48 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi folks!
I've quickly collected a page of things to check before casting your vote
for a staged release.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Reviewing+a+Release
This was done from the back of
Sorry, I was under the impression that the KEY file was automatically
updated from http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc. I've
updated it. Kindly check again.
Thanks,
Jakob
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Jakob,
I
Hi Jakob,
Awesome! Sigs pass now!
[chipotle:~/tmp/giraph-0.1.0] mattmann% curl -O
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/giraph/KEYS
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed
100
Sent from my mobile device.
On Feb 4, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
If I am correct Apache Flex has 2.
Fwiw we have 3: you, Bertrand, and myself.
Greg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
Checksum and signature match. Ran RAT, checked
LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER; all good. Unit tests passed. -C
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy-
The Giraph project is excited to ask incubator for a vote on our first
release.
The vote passed within
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Ross,
On Feb 4, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 4, 2012 3:41 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
34 matches
Mail list logo
