On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>> From: Jukka Zitting
>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: February report review
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefe
+1
Niall
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been a [
I am happy to step out of the way for Jukka. He was clever enough to
stay out of the email s*** storm, and that alone, in my mind, renders
him most qualified.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I already mentioned that I would have nominated you, and so I am
> delighted
I already mentioned that I would have nominated you, and so I am
delighted to read your message. It will be very difficult to choose
between all these strong candidates.
Cheers
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After consideration and some convincing (thanks!), I've
Hi,
After consideration and some convincing (thanks!), I've decided to
throw also my hat into the ring as a candidate to be the next chairman
of the IPMC.
I believe in that role I could be more effective in focusing more of
our collective attention at where I think it would do most good - at
the
Jukka,
I'd love to see you step up, even if only for a short period alongside
Noel, or as chair.
As I've repeated many times I'm keen to work with the IPMC to find the
right setup between here and ComDev. That will take a little time. I agree
that the approach you are taking here is a good one.
- Original Message -
> From: Jukka Zitting
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: February report review
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefer
> wrote:
>>> From: Sam Ruby
>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at
On 8 February 2012 10:41, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
>>
>> AFAIK, this is a known bug with Nexus and/or Maven.
>
> I know the pro
Hi,
On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> From: Sam Ruby
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer
>> wrote:
From: Sam Ruby
P.S. This may very well piss off four people, but have you thought
about being Chair for the Incubator PMC?
>>>
>>> LOL. If Jukk
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
> >
> > I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
> > issues (like Stanbol
- Original Message -
> From: Sam Ruby
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:08 PM
> Subject: Re: February report review
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer
> wrote:
>>> From: Sam Ruby
>>>
>>> I don't mean this to
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> From: Sam Ruby
>>
>>I don't mean this to sound like a "yes, but", but you have identified
>>12 podlings that aren't new and aren't ready to graduate. Are there
>>active plans to address the top issue identified? If there are
>>plans, and
>
> From: Sam Ruby
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:37 PM
>Subject: Re: February report review
>
>On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in gene
Let's reset expectations then so that every
mentor is expected to sign-off on reports.
That way we have a better way of surveying
whether or not a podling is getting it's
share of active participation from mentors.
>
> From: Ross Gardler
>To: Joe Schaefer ; gene
Thanks Jukka, a fair exaltation of the projects I'm involved with.
Single sign off should not be a concern. There are a couple of projects
where, for example, I have participated in report composition but have not
signed off. Only one mentor is required to sign off.
Sent from my mobile device, pl
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
>
> I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
> issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
> NPanday and Zeta Components tha
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
>
> I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
> issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
> NPanday and Zeta Components that
Hi Joe,
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Anybody know what the holdup is for Amber regarding IP Clearance?
I think [0] summarizes it pretty well
Regards
Antonio
[0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/yrcy376p5cmvxv5q
--
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
>
> I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
> issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
> NPanday and Zeta Components that
Nice job Jukka. For me the biggest uptick from Jan was the mentor
participation in the sign-offs, clearly people are taking more time
reading these reports now.
The single-signoff or non-signoff projects are an area of concern
should a pattern emerge. Perhaps we need to take a closer look at
me
Hi,
The podling reports this month [1] seem pretty good in general.
I spent some time unifying report formatting and fixing some minor
issues (like Stanbol needing an intro paragraph). I also pinged
NPanday and Zeta Components that have still not reported (both also
missed their previous report),
+1
--kevan
On Feb 8, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been a [V
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
2012/2/8 Mohammad Nour El-Din
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE], [4], which
+1, good luck!
Ate
On 02/08/2012 03:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE],
+1
david jencks
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE], [4],
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: bval-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 3:39 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP
>
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a whil
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has b
Hi all,
Tony, thanks for your explanation.
@Incubator PMC:
The topic is "Project ready to comply with ASF mirroring guidelines" from the
Incubation Policy:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
It's only a SHALL task, but to me it even sound
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE], [4],
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Hi...
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>> > Is this a discussion thread or a vote thread? If it is a vote thread
>> > please restart it with [VOTE]. I
+1
regards,
gerhard
2012/2/8 Mohammad Nour El-Din
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE], [4], whic
+1 (binding). Good luck guys!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the p
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE], [4], which formally
discussed the graduation to a TLP project. Result annou
Hi...
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> > Is this a discussion thread or a vote thread? If it is a vote thread
> please restart it with [VOTE]. If you want to discuss whether the project
> should graduate then we can do
The Jena PPMC has voted to release
Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating
and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote
for this release.
== Overview
This will be the second incubator release for by Jena; it's the first
Apache release for the TDB module.
Jena is compos
On 20/01/12 06:46, Eric Yang wrote:
Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 2/8/12 11:41 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebb wrote:
On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton wrote:
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
AFAIK, this is a known bug with Nexus and/or Maven.
I know the problem with .asc.md5 and
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
>
> AFAIK, this is a known bug with Nexus and/or Maven.
I know the problem with .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 [1], but not the one
with .
Hi Nial!
First, thanks for the review!
Regarding the asc. This is a known Maven side-effect. It's not beautiful but
doesn't hurt.
Ad the Incubation disclaimer notice.
Thanks for the pointer!
Actually our webpage and documentation aren'tdone yet, but we will make sure to
include the disclaime
40 matches
Mail list logo
