Hola Ricardo,
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:46:07PM +0200, RGB ES wrote:
Ya tengo el escenario armado.
Puedes empezar a practicar, agregándote a la lista de
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/people.html
- presionas el marcador del ACMS
- selecciona [Edit] (quizá antes sea mejor hacer un
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I have no reason to believe that the remediation Rob speaks of has anything
to do with any part of OpenOffice.org.
You mean except for Rob's own statement ?
But one thing not to lose track of is that Symphony
Hi,
I need write access to the incubator Wiki.
My Wiki user name is: Fabian Christ
My Apache user is: fchrist
Best,
- Fabian
--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and
giving constructive feedback where needed, I'd like to propose
something like the shepherd model the ASF board is using for project
reports. For each report a single shepherd [*] is assigned
responsibility for a deeper
Jukka,
This is a good idea. I have signed up. I only ask you bear one thing
in mind. Some months active people here have lots of their own
podlings reporting, which takes quite a bit of time if done
diligently. When assigning shepherd each month please bear in mind how
many reports they are
Hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This is a good idea. I have signed up.
Excellent, thanks!
I only ask you bear one thing in mind. Some months active people here
have lots of their own podlings reporting, which takes quite a bit of time
if
Hi,
this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for releasing
*Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating*
The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have
three binding +1 votes from IPMC members. The PPMC vote thread can be
found here
The Apache MRUnit team is pleased to announce the release of MRUnit
0.9.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator.
This is the fourth release of Apache MRUnit, a Java library that helps
developers unit test Apache Hadoop map reduce jobs.
The release is available here:
On 2 May 2012 10:19, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
This is a good idea. I have signed up.
Excellent, thanks!
I only ask you bear one thing in mind. Some months active people here
have lots
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:54 AM
To: general
Subject: Shepherds for podling reports
Hi,
In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and
giving constructive feedback where needed, I'd like to
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 7:24 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports
On 2 May 2012 10:19, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the
point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed
by the self-fulfilling prophecy: To be released the code must be
clean.
On 2 May 2012 12:50, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
...
Looking a little further forward i.e. not suggesting this initial
small step should be transformed into a larger step but rather looking
at
Hi,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I don't imagine the bucketing to be enshrined in written process, or
even be fixed. More of a convenience. We might do it by, for example,
asking Shepherds to identify the projects they would *prefer* to
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 8:09 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports
On 2 May 2012 12:50, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Fabian Christ
christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote:
I need write access to the incubator Wiki.
I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't
have write access
yet myself. :) Can someone please add me?
Wiki user: MarvinHumphrey
Thanks,
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't
have write access yet myself. :) Can someone please add me?
Wiki user: MarvinHumphrey
I've added you to the admin group[1], so you can add others to the
Contributors group[2]
Hi,
I need write access too to copy and sign off the Amber report.
RaymondFeng
rf...@apache.org
Thanks,
Raymond
On May 2, 2012, at 6:40 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't have
write access
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Raymond Feng wrote:
I need write access too to copy and sign off the Amber report.
RaymondFeng
rf...@apache.org
Should be granted now
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
@Norbert,
It seems more direct to ask Rob what he was thinking of when he made that post
last June.
I can imagine two kinds of remediation that might have happened or be needed
with respect to Symphony:
1. Perhaps IBM detected IP issues in the OO.o code base they received under
license from
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the
point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed
by
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
if IBM (and Rob) know of an IP issue in the code base
This is not a _if_ there is an affirmative public statement by Rob
that this the case
The fact that there has been no such revelation has to be sufficient at
On May 2, 2012 8:10 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
...
I don't imagine the bucketing to be enshrined in written process, or
even be fixed. More of a convenience. We might do it by, for example,
asking Shepherds to identify the projects they would *prefer* to
shepherd and
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On May 2, 2012 5:57 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 2, 2012 8:10 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
...
I don't imagine the bucketing to be enshrined in written process, or
even be fixed. More of a
+1 non-binding
On 02.05.2012 11:28, Fabian Christ wrote:
Hi,
this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for
releasing
*Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating*
The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have
three binding +1 votes from IPMC members.
Hi,
To a large extent the Incubator relies on the efforts of our mentors
to help podling communities learn the Apache Way and the various ASF
policies and practices. Usually this works pretty well, but every know
and then we see podlings that are left struggling with little or no
mentor help. An
Hi, Jukka.
I already joined ipmc when Amber invited me (acknowledged by ipmc too). Which
status file did you refer to?
Thanks,
Raymond Feng
Sent from my iPhone
On May 2, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
To a large extent the Incubator relies on the
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote:
I already joined ipmc when Amber invited me (acknowledged by ipmc too).
Indeed you did, it simply looks like the relevant records
(committee-info.txt, etc.) didn't get updated. I'll fix that.
Which status file did you
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On May 2, 2012 5:57 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Stated interests, and cross-community awareness are at odds with each
other.
The Board
29 matches
Mail list logo
