Re: [WEB] Propuesta para trabajar en la traducción de la página web [era: Editando la wiki en español]

2012-05-02 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hola Ricardo, On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:46:07PM +0200, RGB ES wrote: Ya tengo el escenario armado. Puedes empezar a practicar, agregándote a la lista de http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/people.html - presionas el marcador del ACMS - selecciona [Edit] (quizá antes sea mejor hacer un

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: I have no reason to believe that the remediation Rob speaks of has anything to do with any part of OpenOffice.org. You mean except for Rob's own statement ? But one thing not to lose track of is that Symphony

Incubator Wiki write access

2012-05-02 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, I need write access to the incubator Wiki. My Wiki user name is: Fabian Christ My Apache user is: fchrist Best, - Fabian -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and giving constructive feedback where needed, I'd like to propose something like the shepherd model the ASF board is using for project reports. For each report a single shepherd [*] is assigned responsibility for a deeper

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Ross Gardler
Jukka, This is a good idea. I have signed up. I only ask you bear one thing in mind. Some months active people here have lots of their own podlings reporting, which takes quite a bit of time if done diligently. When assigning shepherd each month please bear in mind how many reports they are

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: This is a good idea. I have signed up. Excellent, thanks! I only ask you bear one thing in mind. Some months active people here have lots of their own podlings reporting, which takes quite a bit of time if

[VOTE] Release Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating

2012-05-02 Thread Fabian Christ
Hi, this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for releasing *Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating* The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have three binding +1 votes from IPMC members. The PPMC vote thread can be found here

[ANNOUNCE] Apache MRUnit 0.9.0-incubating released

2012-05-02 Thread Brock Noland
The Apache MRUnit team is pleased to announce the release of MRUnit 0.9.0-incubating from the Apache Incubator. This is the fourth release of Apache MRUnit, a Java library that helps developers unit test Apache Hadoop map reduce jobs. The release is available here:

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Ross Gardler
On 2 May 2012 10:19, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: This is a good idea. I have signed up. Excellent, thanks! I only ask you bear one thing in mind. Some months active people here have lots

RE: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
-Original Message- From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 4:54 AM To: general Subject: Shepherds for podling reports Hi, In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and giving constructive feedback where needed, I'd like to

RE: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
-Original Message- From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 7:24 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports On 2 May 2012 10:19, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59

Re: Legal question about (re)licensing

2012-05-02 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: snip PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed by the self-fulfilling prophecy: To be released the code must be clean.

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Ross Gardler
On 2 May 2012 12:50, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: -Original Message- From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] ... Looking a little further forward i.e. not suggesting this initial small step should be transformed into a larger step but rather looking at

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: I don't imagine the bucketing to be enshrined in written process, or even be fixed. More of a convenience. We might do it by, for example, asking Shepherds to identify the projects they would *prefer* to

RE: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Franklin, Matthew B.
-Original Message- From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 8:09 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Shepherds for podling reports On 2 May 2012 12:50, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: -Original Message- From:

Re: Incubator Wiki write access

2012-05-02 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Fabian Christ christ.fab...@googlemail.com wrote: I need write access to the incubator Wiki. I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't have write access yet myself. :) Can someone please add me? Wiki user: MarvinHumphrey Thanks,

Re: Incubator Wiki write access

2012-05-02 Thread Nick Burch
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Marvin Humphrey wrote: I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't have write access yet myself. :) Can someone please add me? Wiki user: MarvinHumphrey I've added you to the admin group[1], so you can add others to the Contributors group[2]

Re: Incubator Wiki write access

2012-05-02 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, I need write access too to copy and sign off the Amber report. RaymondFeng rf...@apache.org Thanks, Raymond On May 2, 2012, at 6:40 AM, Nick Burch wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2012, Marvin Humphrey wrote: I went to go take care of this so Jukka wouldn't have to, but I don't have write access

Re: Incubator Wiki write access

2012-05-02 Thread Nick Burch
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Raymond Feng wrote: I need write access too to copy and sign off the Amber report. RaymondFeng rf...@apache.org Should be granted now Nick - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-02 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@Norbert, It seems more direct to ask Rob what he was thinking of when he made that post last June. I can imagine two kinds of remediation that might have happened or be needed with respect to Symphony: 1. Perhaps IBM detected IP issues in the OO.o code base they received under license from

Re: Legal question about (re)licensing

2012-05-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote: snip PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed by

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4 (incubating) RC1

2012-05-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: if IBM (and Rob) know of an IP issue in the code base This is not a _if_ there is an affirmative public statement by Rob that this the case  The fact that there has been no such revelation has to be sufficient at

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Greg Stein
On May 2, 2012 8:10 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: ... I don't imagine the bucketing to be enshrined in written process, or even be fixed. More of a convenience. We might do it by, for example, asking Shepherds to identify the projects they would *prefer* to shepherd and

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Ross Gardler
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On May 2, 2012 5:57 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: On May 2, 2012 8:10 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: ... I don't imagine the bucketing to be enshrined in written process, or even be fixed. More of a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating

2012-05-02 Thread Andreas Kuckartz
+1 non-binding On 02.05.2012 11:28, Fabian Christ wrote: Hi, this is the first Apache Stanbol (incubating) release. Please vote for releasing *Apache Stanbol 0.9.0-incubating* The RC7 for this release has passed our PPMC vote and we already have three binding +1 votes from IPMC members.

Mentor cleanup

2012-05-02 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, To a large extent the Incubator relies on the efforts of our mentors to help podling communities learn the Apache Way and the various ASF policies and practices. Usually this works pretty well, but every know and then we see podlings that are left struggling with little or no mentor help. An

Re: Mentor cleanup

2012-05-02 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, Jukka. I already joined ipmc when Amber invited me (acknowledged by ipmc too). Which status file did you refer to? Thanks, Raymond Feng Sent from my iPhone On May 2, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, To a large extent the Incubator relies on the

Re: Mentor cleanup

2012-05-02 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote: I already joined ipmc when Amber invited me (acknowledged by ipmc too). Indeed you did, it simply looks like the relevant records (committee-info.txt, etc.) didn't get updated. I'll fix that. Which status file did you

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

2012-05-02 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On May 2, 2012 5:57 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: ... Stated interests, and cross-community awareness are at odds with each other. The Board