Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccòilgro...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send
Hi,
The Apache Stanbol PPMC is pleased to announce the first release of
Apache Stanbol versioned as 0.9.0-incubating.
Downloads are available at:
http://incubator.apache.org/stanbol/downloads/releases.html
The Maven artifacts will shortly be available via Maven central.
Regards,
- The Apache
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
sis-dev: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sis-dev/
went from 9 email messages in January 2012 to 32, 74 and 39 in Feb-April 2012
Nice progress, sounds like the wake-up call
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
From activity it looks like this project should have graduated into a TLP a
year
ago. It looks like a mature and well developed project. I don't understand why
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
From activity it looks like this project should have graduated into a TLP a
year
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Nuvem, and the review, Dave!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
It is really hard to know what this project is trying to do other than be a
common
API for Cloud Apps. Very low activity. Apparently no users. A little pick up
Le 5/9/12 6:35 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 9 May 2012 07:42, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco
On 9 May 2012, at 17:23, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
From activity it looks like
On May 9, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
From activity it looks
When adding users to podlings in asf-authorization-template, please
remember to update the incubator unix group as well, otherwise the
users can have problems with some parts of SVN or updating the site.
The following were added to podlings but not the incubator group:
bloodhound: hwright
Hi,
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Blocked from graduation by IP signoff from University of
Newcastle. Report asks for guidance. Why are mentors not providing
this? The projet has, IMHO, been unnecessarily blocked by this since
October 2010.
My
One of the Amber committers Pid (pidster) just restarted the discussion on the
Amber ML and he volunteered to contact the copyright owner. Hopefully the issue
will be resolved soon. But it seems that we are good to move forward.
Thanks,
Raymond
On May 9, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the command to fix this:
modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=hwright,ssc
Done, thanks!
IIUC this only happens with existing Apache committers who join as
podling committers. New podling accounts are automatically added
On 9 May 2012 23:39, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the command to fix this:
modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=hwright,ssc
Done, thanks!
Thanks!
IIUC this only happens with existing Apache
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
...The situation here sounds similar to other podlings that have ended up
in a limbo with no active mentors to guide them. We definitely need
better ways of detecting and dealing with such situations before they
Hi,
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
The Stanbol release is imminent, the seventh (!) release candidate has
just been voted on and should hit this list in the next few days.
Excellent, congratulations on the release!
As a Stanbol mentor I'm
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Lucene.NET!
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
One of the mentors (Stefan Bodewig) has indicated he wants to start pushing
for graduation. UPDATE: Unfortunately, we have not made any progress on this
- hopefully we can have a
Jukka:
Thanks my friend. The way you have been running the IPMC during your
tenure as chair addresses just about everything I have ever bitched
about regarding the Incubator. I really appreciate what you are doing
and the time it must take to do it, but it does not go unnoticed.
-
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
I really appreciate what you are doing
and the time it must take to do it
+1
I'd add that it's become easier to view the Incubator from a project
perspective, as these meta-reviews sharpen the focus on what problems
On 9 May 2012 23:11, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
...
Legal JIRA raised on 30/4/2011 at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-134 - looks like it will
be resolved soon but mentors should
In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns:
* The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent code
change has sparked project interest, but list activity was non existent after
January.
*As Ambari went nearly 2 months without a single e-mail
On 10 May 2012 01:56, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
*As Ambari went nearly 2 months without a single e-mail to the list, I
think an issue for graduation should be added that the community must
demonstrate viability for X more reporting periods (where x IMO is 2).
I just
I have reviewed the flex report and community and didn't find any major issues.
The small things I found are:
1) The report appears to be written by a single person
2) This person appears to be disheartened a bit (We expect the initial RC's to
be rejected as we finalize licensing and other
Hi,
Thanks for the review Matt!
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
* The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent code
change has
sparked project interest, but list activity was non existent after January.
Sounds like the
Actually we discovered after this draft report had been written that we are not
supposed to report this month. It should probably be removed from the incubator
report.
I would not classify the attitude about the RC as negativity. The project is
complex with a long history and I imagine it
On 5/9/2012 6:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Jukka:
Thanks my friend. The way you have been running the IPMC during your
tenure as chair addresses just about everything I have ever bitched
about regarding the Incubator. I really appreciate what you are doing
and the time it must take to do
On May 9, 2012, at 7:12 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
Actually we discovered after this draft report had been written that we are
not supposed to report this month. It should probably be removed from the
incubator report.
I would not classify the attitude about the RC as negativity. The
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
In reviewing the Amabari report, I have a couple of notes/concerns:
* The community IMHO is in serious risk of failure to launch. A recent code
change has sparked project interest, but list activity was non
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like the project community still needs to learn how to develop
code out in the open. The massive revision 1335750 [1] seems to have
been based on no open discussion on the mailing list or the issue
tracker.
Hey Guys,
OK, so it was developed in private, that'll need to be fixed, but it sounds like
you are pushing to have it brought out into the open, so good job here,
Owen.
If you need mentor help to nudge the project along, let me know and I will
be happy to scope and help out. I'll start out by
30 matches
Mail list logo
