The proposal is now available on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetaModelProposal
Anyone who wants to help sponsor/champion this proposal?
-Original Message-
From: David Crossley [mailto:cross...@apache.org]
Sent: 29. januar 2013 22:18
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject
ok thanks, it worked now, therefore my +1.
Tommaso
2013/1/29 Hitesh Shah
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> There are setup steps mentioned at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development for
> getting Ambari to build.
> The web layer requires node.js and brunch.
>
> thanks
> -- Hite
Cancelling RC5.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chen, Pei [mailto:pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:44 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing th
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
--David
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:58 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> - Donation uploaded to people.a.o [1]
> - ICLA from the author (Frank Zhang) has been received by the ASF Secretary.
> - IP Clearance form has been submitted
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
--David
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:43 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Citrix has offered donation of egress firewall manipulation for guest
> networks to Apache CloudStack.
>
> - The code was uploaded to ReviewBoard by the auth
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:30 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Citrix has documentation it wishes to donate to Apache CloudStack
>
> - The ASF Secretary has recorded an ICLA from the author (Jessica Tomechak).
> - The source code
Branko Čibej wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>> David Crossley wrote:
>
> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
> podling metadata is not reliable. That
Kasper Sørensen wrote:
> Thank you for helping David.
>
> My username is KasperSorensen. Can someone please provide me access to create
> a new proposal wiki page on http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
> ?
Done.
-David
Hi Tommaso,
There are setup steps mentioned at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development for
getting Ambari to build.
The web layer requires node.js and brunch.
thanks
-- Hitesh
On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> If I download the SVN tag and
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 29.01.2013 21:18, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>>> It understands [CANCEL], [CANCELED] (wrong) and [CANCELLED] (correct).
>> I thought CANCELED is wrong myself, but then I read:
>> h
On 29.01.2013 21:18, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> It understands [CANCEL], [CANCELED] (wrong) and [CANCELLED] (correct).
> I thought CANCELED is wrong myself, but then I read:
> http://www.reference.com/motif/language/cancelled-vs-canceled
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 29.01.2013 17:11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> could you send the usual [CANCELED] mail?
>> It would help the script to put it to the right side:
>> http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
>
> Ha, you should read
On 29.01.2013 17:23, sebb wrote:
> On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years. In
On 29.01.2013 17:11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> could you send the usual [CANCELED] mail?
> It would help the script to put it to the right side:
> http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
Ha, you should read the script before posting. :)
It understands [CANCEL], [CANCELE
On 1/29/13 12:53 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>
> I have a current example. Flex and Wink haven't updated their
> podlings.xml entries to
> status="graduated"
> , therefore certain infra scripts still consider them podlings rather
> than PMCs.
My bad. I somehow missed that in the list of
Hi,
Closing the vote since its past 72 hours.
Here is the result.
Patrick Hunt( Binding)
Olivier Lamy(Binding)
Mahadev Konar(Binding)
The vote passed with 3 binding votes. Thanks to the mentors for support.
thanks,
Helix team
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:11 PM, kishore g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This
My bad, just did it.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 01/29/2013 05:11 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hello,
could you send the usual [CANCELED] mail?
It would help the script to put it to the right side:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Jea
On 12/20/2012 02:23 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Kalumet 0.6-incubating (2nd try). This will be our first release. A vote
was held on the developer mailing list and passed with 6 +1s:
+1 (binding): Andreas Pie
On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
>>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
>>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
>>> podling meta
Hello,
could you send the usual [CANCELED] mail?
It would help the script to put it to the right side:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Regarding latest Seb's comment, I cancel this vote to fix the legal
On 1/28/2013 11:07 AM, Kasper Sørensen wrote:
Dear all,
After some time spent (yeah, sorry quite a lot more time than we had hoped), we
finally now have the green light to officially post a proposal to the Incubator
to take on MetaModel as a project. Since it's been a while, I wish to call out
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
>> podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
>> ne
Regarding latest Seb's comment, I cancel this vote to fix the legal
files (NOTICE especially).
I will ask for a review before submitting a new release to vote.
Thanks all for your vote and review
Regards
JB
On 12/20/2012 02:23 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for a vot
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
> podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
> need to get podling developers interested with.
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
