On 29.01.2013 17:23, sebb wrote: > On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100: >>>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has >>>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of >>>> podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we >>>> need to get podling developers interested with. >>>> >>> I have a current example. Flex and Wink haven't updated their >>> podlings.xml entries to >>> status="graduated" >>> , therefore certain infra scripts still consider them podlings rather >>> than PMCs. >> Nor had PhotArk updated its entry to "retired" until I did that >> yesterday to get rid of one of the warnings. >> >> I'm not actually all that worried. The worst that can happen in the case >> of the voter script is that some votes don't get recorded, or are >> recorded later than expected. The script does emit warnings if it sees >> strangeness; I /could/ teach it to send the warnings to the podling's >> dev list (if known), cc: general@. But I'd rather not open the spam >> floodgates unless people really want me to. > Why not append the errors to the end of the report?
Good idea, I'll do that. -- Brane --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
