On 01.02.2013 20:48, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej
On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
The only supported way to get content to the web
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site
On Saturday, February 2, 2013, wrote:
Author: grobmeier
Date: Sat Feb 2 15:22:33 2013
New Revision: 1441762
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441762view=rev
Log:
updated status page for onami
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/onami.xml
Modified:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, February 2, 2013, wrote:
Author: grobmeier
Date: Sat Feb 2 15:22:33 2013
New Revision: 1441762
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441762view=rev
Log:
updated status page for onami
Modified:
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
Thanks for reminding me again ... silly me.
change the incubator.a.o
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
Thanks for
On 02.02.2013 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
whimsy doesn't have the
On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
SVN source tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-150/
Since when do source packages not have to be
On 02.02.2013 21:36, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
SVN source tag
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-150/
On 23.01.2013 14:51, Simone Tripodi wrote:
[ ] +1, let's get it rmblee!!!
[ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
[ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
So IPMCs please cast your votes!
+1
I still wish the source package was easier to find.
-- Brane
Hi All,
Thanks for the community feedback so far.
Since conversation is stabilizing, I am going to call for an official VOTE
starting on Monday early AM PT. I'll let it run through the whole week,
closing it around Friday EOD PT, and then we can go from there depending
on the outcome.
Thank you
Dear Nick,
Please add yourself to the proposal on the wiki as a mentor and/or PPMC
member and committer in the proposal table. I will call a VOTE next week
on Monday so if you can do it before then, thanks. Otherwise I'll do it
but I don't know your affiliation.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/27/13 10:34
13 matches
Mail list logo
