Anyone else interested, now that the project page has been updated with the
full contributor list ?
-Original Message-
From: Kasper Sørensen [mailto:kasper.soren...@humaninference.com]
Sent: 22. februar 2013 09:39
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [PROPOSAL] MetaModel join the Ap
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> Tom do you want to be a champion for this proposal?
Yes, I'd be happy to.
One thing I think is worth discussing more here is whether Provisionr
should be a TLP on graduation, or whether it should be a module in
Whirr. Provisionr shares no co
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Tom White wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
>
>> Tom do you want to be a champion for this proposal?
>
> Yes, I'd be happy to.
>
> One thing I think is worth discussing more here is whether Provisionr
> should be a TLP on graduation, or
Please add my account to the ContributorsGroup so I can create an
incubator proposal for a new project
called MRQL (the MapReduce query processing system).
My username is LeonidasFegaras. My project is sponsored by Edward J.
Yoon.
Thank you
Leonidas Fegaras
fega...@cse.uta.edu
http://lambda.u
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
> Please add my account to the ContributorsGroup so I can create an incubator
> proposal for a new project called MRQL (the MapReduce query processing
> system). My username is LeonidasFegaras.
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
I'd like to share the changes of Tajo proposal. I've added Roshan Sumbaly
to the list of initial committers. He is a Sr. Software Engineer in
LinkedIn.
You can see the wiki diff from the following link:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TajoProposal?action=diff&rev1=15&rev2=13
Cheers,
Hyunsik Choi
On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 2/26/13 4:18 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>
>>>
>>> This is exactly the scenario I have in mind. Most of the times,
>>> projects aim for being very successful and have their own healthy
>>> community, but that is not a
Hi Dave,
On 2/27/13 9:44 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>[..snip..]
Thanks for the examples.
>Each case differs. I can agree that we do not want to encourage new
>podlings to come in with Plan A to be graduating into an existing TLP,
>but I don't think we should exclude a future case should it be st
Thanks Tom!
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Tom White wrote:
> BTW Andrei, please put the proposal on the Incubator wiki so others
> can edit it, and so it's easy to find in the future.
>
I have updated the proposal and posted it on the Incubator wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Provisi
Just trying to understand what is being suggested...
Is it that, should a podling decide it can't go for TLP, and that
another TLP is prepared to accept them, then effectively the
responsibility that the incubator PMC has is transferred to that TLP.
*They* need to incubate the new community into i
Hi Benson -
Thanks for your feedback! It's too early to decide if there is an overlap
between communities. Provisionr solves a different problem being focused on
semi-automated workflows (e.g. with Rundeck) and cloud portability while
Whirr is more focused on deploying services from the Hadoop sta
I think the following presentation does a better job at explaining the
scope of Provisionr:
http://www.slideshare.net/savu.andrei/creating-pools-of-virtual-machines-apachecon-na-2013
Regards,
-- Andrei Savu
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:28
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Guys, this was my point a few weeks ago, and the question I posed to
> the board. Did the board discuss it at the meeting, or is that part of
> the board meeting happening here?
Here is the comment I made in response to your question. Se
Hi,
I would like to request addition to the ContributorsGroup so that I can have
write access to the incubator wiki. The purpose of this request is to work on
an incubator proposal.
username: PaulRamirez
Thanks,
Paul Ramirez
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J)
wrote:
> PaulRamirez
Added you, happy contributing!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incuba
Hi,
I'd like to work on an incubation proposal through wiki.
Would you please give me a "write" access?
My wiki user name is "H. Joe Lee".
Thanks,
--
HDF: Software that Powers Science
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-
Hi there Joe,
I went ahead and granted karma.
Please let me know if it works. It might not since there are spaces in
your wiki username,
so if it doesn't work let me know.
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/27/13 3:04 PM, "H. Joe Lee" wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I'd like to work on an incubation proposal through wiki.
I think you need to edit ContributorsGroup to make the [[username a link]]
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote on Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 23:06:44 +:
> Hi there Joe,
>
> I went ahead and granted karma.
>
> Please let me know if it works. It might not since there are spaces in
> your wiki username,
Hello all,
MRQL (miracle)[1] is looking for mentors and more volunteers. We hope
you will plan to participate and give us your feedback if you have any
interest in this project.
Thanks.
1. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MRQLProposal
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pei Chen closed PODLINGNAMESEARCH-24.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the clarification on ctakes-private and approval S
On Feb 27, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Just trying to understand what is being suggested...
>
> Is it that, should a podling decide it can't go for TLP, and that
> another TLP is prepared to accept them, then effectively the
> responsibility that the incubator PMC has is transferred to
Dear Incubator PMC,
Tajo is not just a PLAN. It is a real project already working on real
environments. As you can see, Tajo has relatively high quality initial
codebase and a solid history. Also, we showed the reasonable future plan
based on the current status of Tajo. We are confident that Tajo
22 matches
Mail list logo