From the subject line I thought this was going to be another attempt to
sort out the incubator :-/
...ant
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose MetaModel for the incubator.
Matt Franklin will be the
Juan Pablo Santos RodrÃguez created PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33:
Summary: Establish whether Apache JSPWiki is a suitable name
Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33
URL:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating)
version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in Apache
.
The candidate for Mesos 0.11.0-incubating release is available at:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating)
version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in Apache
.
The candidate for Mesos 0.11.0-incubating release is available at:
Thanks Luciano for the suggestions. I think we got some conflicting advice
before (when we released 0.9.0) about what goes into LICENSE and NOTICE.
I've (hopefully) fixed it now. Will whip up RC3 shortly.
@vinodkone
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.comwrote:
Also, note that the vote for RC2 has been cancelled.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Vinod Kone vi...@twitter.com wrote:
Thanks Luciano for the suggestions. I think we got some conflicting advice
before (when we released 0.9.0) about what goes into LICENSE and NOTICE.
I've (hopefully)
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:40:19PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Is this the recommended configuration or shall we svn remove the whole
old tree, maybe leaving only a README.txt pointing to the new location?
Ask infra about arranging a redirect - this might be possible but would have to
be
Hi folks,
Can somebody let me know what is the process of obtaining write access to
the incubator wiki? I need to add an incubator proposal.
Thanks
Azeez
--
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com,
*Member; Apache Software Foundation;
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Vinod Kone vinodk...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
(incubating)
version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in Apache
.
The candidate for Mesos 0.11.0-incubating release is available
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Juan Pablo Santos RodrÃguez updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33:
-
Description:
We have to do some
You need to let us know your wiki username, and we will grant you write
access.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 03:48 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
Hi folks,
Can somebody let me know what is the process of obtaining write access to
the incubator wiki? I need to add an incubator proposal.
If no one minds I will change them all to dormant, since all are welcome back
to the fold, should they so desire.
Regards,
Alan
On May 27, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:17 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
I think
My wiki username is AfkhamAzeez
Thanks
--
Afkham Azeez
Sent from my phone
On May 29, 2013 11:17 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
You need to let us know your wiki username, and we will grant you write
access.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 03:48 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
Hi
You have write access now.
Please see this guide:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html
And please see these proposals for examples:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
I would look at for example BeanShell or Callback or any other recent one.
Cheers
Christian
On
There are already a lot of discussions about it and this aint one of them =P
- Henry
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
From the subject line I thought this was going to be another attempt to
sort out the incubator :-/
...ant
On Tue, May 28, 2013
I agree with Mark and John, the terms mean different things, and the term
retired is reasonably well understood now and mentioned in various places
in the Incubator documentation so wouldn't it be better to keep it as is?
Are there really any dormant poddlings? If so probably they are really
I can't see any place in the docs that describe dormant.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:36 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Mark and John, the terms mean different things, and the term
retired is reasonably well understood now and mentioned in various places
in the Incubator
What we really need now is a few hundred more emails on this exciting subject,
just like every other year! At the end we can all agree to disagree and go
away sad that nothing ever gets done around here, just like every other year we
have this interesting debate!
Party on I say.
Sent from my
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Your notice still looks wrong, for example, boto-2.0b2.zip license
says that the copyright notice should be included in all copies of the
software, and the boto README has :
Copyright (c) 2006-2010 Mitch Garnaat
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Your notice still looks wrong, for example, boto-2.0b2.zip license
says that the copyright notice should be included in all copies of
Hi all,
ambari-1.2.3-incubating-rc1 release candidate is now available.
Here's a summary of Ambari 1.2.3 features:
* Improved stability
* Ability to update core-site.xml properties post-install
* Ability to add and remove custom configuration properties
* New Heatmaps (Host CPU WIO %, HBase
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:36 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Mark and John, the terms mean different things, and the term
retired is reasonably well understood now and mentioned in various places
in the Incubator documentation so wouldn't it be better to keep it as is?
Henry,
Thank you for submitting this proposal. I am very glad to be a mentor for
this project and look forward to working with you and the broader
community. I have a couple of comments with regards to the stated proposal -
First - as noted in the proposal MetaModel has been an open source
Hi Arvind,
For concern 1 I will let the lead engineer Kasper to answer. I believe if
the contributors already signed copyright agreement to Human Inference then
it should be fine since it means all code contributions belong to Human
Inference which will then be transferred to ASF.
Someone might
24 matches
Mail list logo
