It sounds good.
Regards
JB
On 09/25/2013 01:17 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
So what about Baldr?
BTW we can start incubation using Monitoring then change the name for TLP?
WDYT?
On 21 September 2013 06:30, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to throw in this document:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
When a proposal is just a candidate, there are two possible approaches (for
those interested in committership)
IMO once the possible approaches are documented, we should require
incoming podlings to
+1 from me (binding).
G'luck!
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org,
general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Monday, September 23, 2013 5:44 AM
To:
This is a reminder that this vote is scheduled to close in about 24
hours out of 72 hours and we still have no binding votes from the
Incubator PMC.
This is our first release and we have spent a lot of time to migrate
our old source code to the Apache infrastructure and to adapt the
Apache
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for Aurora to
become an incubated project.
The proposal is pasted below, and also available at:
On 24 September 2013 13:44, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. MRQL is a
query processing and optimization system for large-scale, distributed
data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop, Hama, and Spark.
This is our
+1 for accepting Aurora. I'd like to contribute to aurora project as well.
Thanks
Sent from my iPad
Chan
On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.edu wrote:
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
published a snapshot of the their
+1
Looking forward to being a part of Aurora and its incubation
-Jake
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.eduwrote:
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
Hi Sebastian,
Thank you for checking our release.
I think you clicked on the wrong tree link at our GIT repo.
The source tree is:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mrql.git;a=tree;h=385ba2829bdf184886ac82b5db793f1264bbcf3c;hb=385ba2829bdf184886ac82b5db793f1264bbcf3c
which
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.edu wrote:
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for
On 26 September 2013 18:44, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Thank you for checking our release.
I think you clicked on the wrong tree link at our GIT repo.
The source tree is:
Hi all,
This vote is canceled due to the problems found in this release (the
most important of which is that the content of LICENSE NOTICE files
of the provided artifacts was found to be wrong).
We will fix all these issues and we will generate a new release
candidate.
My thanks to all who
A Mentoring question.
Some of the committers in a podling want to access Jenkins.
The instructions are here:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins#How_do_I_get_an_account
I take it that for a podling any of the mentors should take the role of the PMC
Chair and do this action. Please let me
Hey Dave
You are correct, but the mentor would have to have the ability to edit ldap
perms and hopefully an understanding that by enabling the hudson-jobadmin
karma that the user would be able to configure any job within jenkins and
not just that specific projects jobs. When enabling this for
+1
On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.edu wrote:
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for Aurora to
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.eduwrote:
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks
Raminder
On Sep 26, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
+1 from me (binding).
G'luck!
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.eduwrote:
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team recently
published a snapshot of the their source code on github (
https://github.com/twitter/aurora), I'd like to call a vote for
+1.
Milinda
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.edu
wrote:
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team
recently
published a snapshot of the
+1
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Benjamin Hindman
benjamin.hind...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.edu
wrote:
Since discussion about the Aurora proposal has calmed and the team
recently
published a snapshot of the
Graduation community vote passed with 7 +1 from , which from those 6
are binding :
Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Ant Elder
Christian Grobmeier
Jukka Zitting
Luciano Resende
Alan D. Cabrera
Jie Huang (non-binding)
I'll check the status of the resolution and continue the process on the IPMC.
Thanks
+1
--
Ross Allen
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Nirmal Fernando nirmal070...@apache.orgwrote:
+1
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Benjamin Hindman
benjamin.hind...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.edu
wrote:
22 matches
Mail list logo
