Those sound like fine experiments to try - having a release auditor,
and a new podling with the PPMC have binding votes and initially
seeded just with IPMC members - however they aren't the experiments i
was thinking of.
What i'd like to try is more similar to the pTLP approach previously
talked
Thank you all guys for reviewing this release. We will move forward to
the next step.
Marvin,
Thank you for your comment and advice. Your comments are very helpful
for me to understand IPMC vote. Also, we will resolve IP audit before
the next release.
- hyunsik
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:46 AM,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:43 PM, James Taylor jtay...@salesforce.comwrote:
Hi All,
We're pleased to share a draft ASF incubation proposal for Phoenix, a
SQL layer over HBase, initially developed at Salesforce.com and
subsequently open sourced on github
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote:
It is indeed very specific for HBase use I suppose. Would it be more
beneficial to make it sub-project of HBase to get full community
support from HBase?
I'm on the HBase PMC and am enthusiastically +1 for
Phoenix is a wonderful addition as sub-project of HBase and I use it
everyday in production.
+1 from me for sure.
— Patrick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Patrick Reilly preilly at php.net writes:
Phoenix is a wonderful addition as sub-project of HBase and I use it
everyday in production.
+1 from me for sure.
— Patrick
Sorry, I meant a top level project not a sub-project of HBase.
I apologize for the confusion.
— Patrick
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Henry Saputra
henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote:
It is indeed very specific for HBase use I suppose. Would it be more
beneficial to make it sub-project of HBase to get full community
Clean this up from the voting monitor.
This has been superseded by RC4 at the project level anyway...
Sorry for leaving it open for so long. (I may have forgotten it)
Ali
On 15 June 2013 23:24, Ali Lown a...@apache.org wrote:
The Wave community has voted on and approved the proposal to release
+1 for Phoenix as well.
SQL access for HBase is a repeated thread in the community and while we
probably aren't at the point where there is a single answer for this - and
may never be - it would be nice to have a few preferred options, so to
speak, with robust communities around them. Also, per
Thanks to those who did follow-up. That clears a bit.
Another plea from me to help you to clear the clutter:
I reviewed the mail archives for the outstanding ones
to see why the Vote Monitor did not detect their vote result.
I do not have time to correct them nor to tweak voter.py
but hope that
Dear all,
Thank you for your supports. At least vote period passed, and we have
3 IPMC +1s. We will proceed with the release.
http://markmail.org/thread/njypqxvhlvwsnteb
Binding votes (3)
Henry Saputra (binding)
Jakob Homan (binding)
Olivier Lamy (binding)
- hyunsik
The Strom project is just entering the incubator. We have promised our
community that we will issue a stable 0.9.0 release prior to switching over to
the Apache release process. We are currently in a release candidate process.
Now that we are an Incubator project, but not yet releasing under
If you release as an Apache Incubator project, the disclaimer is required.
If you release as your prior project, with prior infra and procedures, then
no.
Note: you cannot release as an Incubator project unless you use Apache
procedures.
Cheers,
-g
On Nov 14, 2013 11:49 PM, P. Taylor Goetz
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I still think that having a Release Auditor role provides backup for
getting incubator releases out without having folks have to be on the IPMC
to approve the legal aspects of a release. Just like any ASF Member can
backup
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:08 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
What i'd like to try is more similar to the pTLP approach previously
talked about. So take some existing podling, eg Stratos and/or
VXQuery, and give the PPMC binding votes. They have experienced and
active mentors so there
First few words should read A disclaimer ...
I blame a combo of jet lag and *really* slow net link. Not the guy who hit
send without proofing, of course.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I disclaimer to clarify that the 0.9.0 release is neither an
16 matches
Mail list logo
