+1
On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting process,
> I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select
> podlings to earn binding votes under limited circumstances by comple
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
> [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment.
Here is my +1
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@in
On Friday, December 13, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
> [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment.
>
+1
The Apache Sirona Team is pleased to announce the first release
0.1-incubating of Apache Sirona project.
Apache Sirona provide a simple but extensible monitoring solution for
Java applications.
It's an incubating project and a technology preview release. So some
APIs can be change in the future.
NOTICE, LICENSE, and README files looks good.
Checksum and signatures on the source jar looks good.
Per comments by Marvin and sebb, Spark will resolve the included jar
files in the source distribution in next release of 0.9 I am giving:
+1
since this is 0.8.1 release which really hard to change
FYI we got the last missing IPMC binding vote.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sirona-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAN%3DtixmOspWgDXwVTfRiKvMK3kwBwRpiVrmzJ5xwKGiWDk3xfg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
So the vote now passed the requirement of 3 IPMC binding vote
SO the vote has passed.
On 2 Dece
[X] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
I kinda feel it doesn't need the Policy change and at this point it should be
the 2014 ... but hey - still a positive vote.
Regards,
Dave
On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> As the next step in our ongoing
> * only key from one committer, without his apache email address
I'll generate a key w/ my apache address for the next release. So far
we've only had one release manager so there is only one key.
> * few dependencies retrieved from out of maven central
This has been covered extensively in this th
Obviously +1 from me on doing experiments, and -1 for the silly policy
update stuff.
...ant
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting
> process,
> I propose that we run an experiment allowing
Hi,
although the basics looks fine:
* keys checked
* builds fine on a clean environment
I got some warnings that should be fixed in future releases:
* only key from one committer, without his apache email address
* few dependencies retrieved from out of maven central
* some libraries' binaries
> [X ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks for the links Andrew, those are good insights.
- Henry
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote:
> You might also want to have a look at how Scala itself deals with the issue
> of required binaries for the build:
>
> https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/master/pull-binary-li
12 matches
Mail list logo
