I see a lot of conceptual similarity between Optiq and the Apache MetaModel
(incubator) project [1]. Maybe something can be done to align the two projects,
so that we avoid having two incubating projects that do basically the same
thing?
Or maybe there's some glaring difference that I am
I think that there is a huge difference between Metamodel and Optiq.
In particular:
- Optiq provides real SQL including nested queries, correlated sub-queries
and so on
- Metamodel uses a fluent Java API ... SQL parsing and transformation
doesn't appear to be a goal
- Optiq provides highly
I agree with Ted. Optiq is a full fledged cost-based query optimization
framework for relational workloads.
I also want to highlight Optiq's JDBC infrastructure (and ODBC at a later
point as well). Rather than implementing the JDBC specification, Optiq
users only have to implement a few
+1
On Apr 30, 2014, at 10:44 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
releases, increased our contributor and committer
Hi all,
Just wondering if any other IPMCs have had a chance to look at this vote.
I know that they'd love to be able to show the release on their report
this quarter.
For what it's worth, here's my non binding +1.
John
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rahul,
+ 1 for the release.
I found few non-blocking improvements you want to make for next release. I
debated if they need to be fixed now, but creating JIRA’s and assuring to be
fixed for next release should do.
* The NOTICE file has Eclipse icon and SLF4J license url’s, both of them
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014, at 10:44 PM, James Taylor wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from
the
incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made
three
releases, increased our contributor and committer list [2], and have
This reminds me:
I assume the podling is aware that the names listed in the proposed
board resolution will become the initial PMC?
i.e. everyone listed in the resolution will become a PMC member (and committer).
There was at least one recent graduation where this was not understood.
They
Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the
graduation vote now.
Suresh
On Apr 29, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana sanj...@wso2.com wrote:
+1 to graduate.
I'd like to echo Paul's sentiments .. thanks for the support and nudging!
Sanjiva.
On Tue,
Stratos PPMC,
Can you verify if all the names listed are indeed PMC? I would assume so since
stratos has been following PPMC=Committer.
Suresh
On May 1, 2014, at 10:15 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
This reminds me:
I assume the podling is aware that the names listed in the proposed
On 1 May 2014 15:16, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the
graduation vote now.
There was 1 issue:
Mohammad Noureldin does not want to be part of the initial PMC
Also I asked if the podling is aware that the initial
On May 1, 2014, at 10:26 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 May 2014 15:16, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the
graduation vote now.
There was 1 issue:
Mohammad Noureldin does not want to be part of the
I also do not wish to be on the PMC after graduation [1]
Marlon
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stratos-dev/201404.mbox/%3C533C0454.3000304%40iu.edu%3E
On 5/1/14 10:21 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Stratos PPMC,
Can you verify if all the names listed are indeed PMC? I would
On May 1, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Marlon Pierce marpi...@iu.edu wrote:
I also do not wish to be on the PMC after graduation [1]
ACK. Will remove from the vote email.
Suresh
Marlon
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stratos-dev/201404.mbox/%3C533C0454.3000304%40iu.edu%3E
Apache Hive has recently started work to integrate with Optiq as well. Having
it as an Apache project will be good for both Optiq and Apache.
Alan.
On Apr 30, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote:
I would like to propose Optiq as an Apache Incubator project. I have
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:49:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
[
Great news! Thanks everyone :-)
On 1 May 2014 19:34, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:49:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this
+1 We are delighted to join the Apache Incubator
On 1 May 2014 19:35, Martin Harris martin.har...@cloudsoftcorp.com wrote:
Great news! Thanks everyone :-)
On 1 May 2014 19:34, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:49:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
Hi,
I need write access to the incubator wiki to add the monthly report for the
Stratosphere project here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2014
My username is rmetzger.
Robert
Hey Robert
You are all set
-Jake
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I need write access to the incubator wiki to add the monthly report for the
Stratosphere project here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2014
My username is rmetzger.
I am certainly not questioning the power of Optiq. Just noting that I think it
has a lot of similarities, and obviously there are differences. But even in
your list I find a lot of the points to be close or similar. I would hate to
start a war over words in this thread, since I actually only
+1
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
releases, increased our contributor and
+1
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
releases, increased our contributor and
Unfortunately, similar projects entering Apache incubator are common things =(
Even though each original project proposers can argue about
differences in one way or another, it will eventually decided by
adoption and community growth, and at the end the quality of the
project itself.
Some other
One could imagine as part of the case for incubation and graduation both an
articulation of the project's place in the larger ecosystem, similar to how
academic papers customarily place their work and novel findings within the
larger field in 'Related Work'. If not part of the initial proposal,
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Kasper Sørensen
kasper.soren...@humaninference.com wrote:
- Can you explain or link to more information about the type inference you
mention?
The type inferencing is used by Drill.
The problem is that strong typing is normally required to parse SQL
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
One could imagine as part of the case for incubation and graduation both an
articulation of the project's place in the larger ecosystem, similar to how
academic papers customarily place their work and novel findings
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:44 PM, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Phoenix podling has has discussed and voted to graduate from the
incubator with 22 +1 votes, 5 of which were IPMC vote [1]. We've made three
releases, increased our contributor and committer
Hi Suresh,
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Stratos PPMC,
Can you verify if all the names listed are indeed PMC? I would assume so
since stratos has been following PPMC=Committer.
Yes, we followed PPMC=Committer. And there is a request from Mohammad
Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top Level
Project. The board resolution is included below.
[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP because…
Cheers,
Suresh
=== Board Resolution
HI Suresh,
Thanks for the vote, I think we can make a few JIRAs and then target them
in the next release.
For now, I am not sure of removing the .settings, .classpath, .project. We
have kept this configuration in our repo. FWIW, this is an eclipse plugin
and a few configurations have been packed
31 matches
Mail list logo
